The following is a guest post from Harold DeMonaco, MS, one of our story reviewers on HealthNewsReview.org. The opinions are his.
—————————————————————————
In April of this year, I wrote a guest blog post in which I suggested that healthcare workers did not seem to be very good role models with regard to obesity. While a number of interventions have been attempted (including Mayor Bloomberg’s proposed ban on giant soft drinks in New Your City, labeling food calorie content and others), most have not produced repeatable results. At the risk of being accused of serving as an arm of marketing for the Massachusetts General Hospital, I want to point out a rather interesting study.
The August edition of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine includes an article (link to pdf file) by researchers at the MGH that adds a bit of new information to our understanding of how to deal with the obesity epidemic.
The idea under study is appealingly simple; color coding food choices in the hospital’s cafeteria. In addition, the display placement of healthy choices was optimized.
The study examined in purchases of about 4600 employees over a 9 month period, starting prior to the introduction of the “traffic light” labeling program, followed by the food placement changes. The results were recorded based on employee’s self-identification of ethnicity.
Here are the results:
Employees self-identif?ed as white (73%); black (10%); Latino (7%); and Asian (10%).
Compared to White employees, Latino and Black employees purchased a higher percentage of red items at baseline (18%, 28% and 33%respectively, p<0.01. Labeling decreased all employees’ red item purchases (–11.2%,95%CI_–13.6%,–8.9%)and increased green purchases (6.6%,95%CI_5.2%,7.9%). Red beverage purchases decreased most (–23.8%,95%CI_–28.1%,–19.6%). The choice architecture intervention further decreased red purchases after the labeling. Intervention effects were similar across all race/ethnicity and job types (p_0.05 for interaction between race or job type and intervention).
Mean calories per beverage decreased similarly over the study period for all racial groups and job types, with no increase in per-beverage spending.
The authors concluded:
Despite baseline differences in healthy food purchases, a simple color-coded labeling and choice architecture intervention improved food and beverage choices among employees from all racial and socioeconomic backgrounds.
Of course, no single study is definitive and it remains to be seen if the results are reproducible in other healthcare and non-healthcare settings. But would it not be interesting to see what would happen if this system were implemented in fast food franchises?
——————————-
Note: Katherine Harmon also reported on the study for Scientific American.
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Comments are closed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like