Julia Belluz writes the Science-ish blog – a joint project of Maclean’s, the Medical Post and the McMaster Health Forum in Toronto. This week she reviewed Gwyneth Paltrow’s new book, “It’s All Good: Delicious, Easy Recipes That Will Make You Look Good and Feel Great.” Excerpts:
“Science-ish was immediately stung by the panorama of pseudoscience premises on which the cookbook rests.
Paltrow opens by describing how she was literally brought to the brink of death—culminating in no less than a migraine and panic attack—after too many stress- and French fry-filled months.
She undergoes what sounds like every medical test imaginable, and finds she has a thyroid problem, anemia, vitamin D deficiency, a congested liver, hormones that were “off,” and “inflammation” in her system. “Another roster of tests” exposed “high levels of metals and a blood parasite.” Mixing her young children into the madness, she gets them tested for food sensitivities, too, and finds they are all intolerant of gluten, dairy, and chickens’ eggs, among other things.
While some of her ailments (An inflamed system? High metal levels?) are questionable bordering on quack-ish, and food-sensitivity testing has been shown to be an expensive waste of time, the most distressing part of the book is what comes next.*
The actress says she went to her doctor, Alejandro Junger—also known as the MD behind the “Clean” regime—and he prescribed an “elimination diet.” Instead of addressing and finding the causes of some of Paltrow’s real health woes, like vitamin deficiency, anemia, and liver congestion, which can be caused by heart failure, he advises she cut out basically everything but quinoa and lettuce. No meat, potatoes, sugar, dairy, eggs, coffee, alcohol, wheat, and, oddly, bell peppers, corn, and eggplant.
Science-ish asked Dr. Yoni Freedhoff, an evidence-based and obesity-focused family physician, about the scientific basis for such a purge. He said, “The recommendation itself at best can be described as non evidence-based hope, and at worst, as plain old malpractice.”
Belluz hit a nerve on this one. See the 30 comments and 125 Twitter reactions (and counting) as of this posting.
And here’s a podcast in which she discusses the book and the claims in it.
I finally met Belluz at the recent Association of Health Care Journalists annual conference in Boston and she and I will be on a panel together at the 8th World Conference of Science Journalists in Helsinki in June.
————————-
Follow us on Facebook, and on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer
https://twitter.com/healthnewsrevu
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Don Piontek
April 5, 2013 at 4:32 pmMore proof that we are in an age when real science has been relegated to a back seat behind anecdotal evidence and pseudo-“experts”. The best is the gluten thing. All of a sudden, half the population has become gluten-intolerent. Every time I walk into an organic food coop, or a vitamin shop, I marvel at the product claims which are not supported by any empirical scientific evidence at all.
Beth Kitchin PhD RD
April 8, 2013 at 11:13 amAgree- this gluten craze is particularly ridiculous. Last week, someone told me that she went on google and found out that she is gluten insensitive! Wow – Dr. Google!
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like