Note to our followers: Due to a lack of sufficient funding, will cease daily publication of new content at the end of 2018. Publisher Gary Schwitzer and other contributors may post new articles periodically. If you wish to donate, your gift might help keep the site available to the public for a few more years, by defraying costs of web hosting and maintenance. All of our 6,000+ published articles contain lessons to help people improve their critical thinking about health care. Read more about our change in status. And here's how to make a donation.

Swedish news watchdog effort on complementary and alternative medicine stories

Add to the mix of global efforts to critically analyze health care news stories a Swedish project called KritiKAM.  This one looks only at stories about complementary and alternative medicine.  It’s part of a broader site from the Integrative Care Science Center in Stockholm – most of which is translated into English.  You can read background about the KritiKam project in English, but the story reviews have not yet been translated.  Google Translate can be used to give you a sense of how the reviews are done – a process very similar to that employed by the various Media Doctor sites around the globe and by

In recent years I’ve had occasional contact with health journalist David Finer of Stockholm, who is web editor of the project and one of the reviewers.  He tells me that he hopes for future funding to allow for evidence-based analysis of all types of health news in Sweden.

Funding has become a critical issue for many such project.  Media Doctor Australia, the pioneer of such efforts, published its last review 8 months ago and announced in November that financial and human resources had run out after 8 years.  Media Doctor Canada has also shut down for similar reasons.  Funding for our own project is in jeopardy – with a loss of funding probable by July 1.

Here’s a screenshot of a translation of one of the KritiKam story reviews:


Follow us on Facebook, and on Twitter:

You might also like


We Welcome Comments. But please note: We will delete comments left by anyone who doesn’t leave an actual first and last name and an actual email address.

We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, or profanity. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. Comments should primarily discuss the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages about health and medicine. This is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science. Nor is it a forum to share your personal story about a disease or treatment -- your comment must relate to media messages about health care. If your comment doesn't adhere to these policies, we won't post it. Questions? Please see more on our comments policy.

Comments are closed.