Add to the mix of global efforts to critically analyze health care news stories a Swedish project called KritiKAM. This one looks only at stories about complementary and alternative medicine. It’s part of a broader site from the Integrative Care Science Center in Stockholm – most of which is translated into English. You can read background about the KritiKam project in English, but the story reviews have not yet been translated. Google Translate can be used to give you a sense of how the reviews are done – a process very similar to that employed by the various Media Doctor sites around the globe and by HealthNewsReview.org.
In recent years I’ve had occasional contact with health journalist David Finer of Stockholm, who is web editor of the project and one of the reviewers. He tells me that he hopes for future funding to allow for evidence-based analysis of all types of health news in Sweden.
Funding has become a critical issue for many such project. Media Doctor Australia, the pioneer of such efforts, published its last review 8 months ago and announced in November that financial and human resources had run out after 8 years. Media Doctor Canada has also shut down for similar reasons. Funding for our own project is in jeopardy – with a loss of funding probable by July 1.
Here’s a screenshot of a translation of one of the KritiKam story reviews:
————————————-
Follow us on Facebook, and on Twitter:
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
Weekly Digest-- Pharma banks on cancer patients who are ‘determined to keep fighting’ - https://t.co/916BSBxuuW
Not the same. One is run by a professional medical/advocacy group. Other is administered by a university-based journalism training organization. Read the journalist quotes in our piece about how this is different.
@HealthNewsRevu Isn't the Gerontological Society practice of funding fellows for coverage the same as what's used by many journalistic fellowships? See Center for Health Reporting at USC.
Comments
We Welcome Comments. But please note: We will delete comments left by anyone who doesn’t leave an actual first and last name and an actual email address.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, or profanity. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. Comments should primarily discuss the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages about health and medicine. This is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science. Nor is it a forum to share your personal story about a disease or treatment -- your comment must relate to media messages about health care. If your comment doesn't adhere to these policies, we won't post it. Questions? Please see more on our comments policy.
Comments are closed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like