Add to the mix of global efforts to critically analyze health care news stories a Swedish project called KritiKAM. This one looks only at stories about complementary and alternative medicine. It’s part of a broader site from the Integrative Care Science Center in Stockholm – most of which is translated into English. You can read background about the KritiKam project in English, but the story reviews have not yet been translated. Google Translate can be used to give you a sense of how the reviews are done – a process very similar to that employed by the various Media Doctor sites around the globe and by HealthNewsReview.org.
In recent years I’ve had occasional contact with health journalist David Finer of Stockholm, who is web editor of the project and one of the reviewers. He tells me that he hopes for future funding to allow for evidence-based analysis of all types of health news in Sweden.
Funding has become a critical issue for many such project. Media Doctor Australia, the pioneer of such efforts, published its last review 8 months ago and announced in November that financial and human resources had run out after 8 years. Media Doctor Canada has also shut down for similar reasons. Funding for our own project is in jeopardy – with a loss of funding probable by July 1.
Here’s a screenshot of a translation of one of the KritiKam story reviews:
————————————-
Follow us on Facebook, and on Twitter:
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
Monday at #ADA2021, an infectious disease epidemiologist, a journalist, and a researcher shared perspectives on communication of risk in the era of COVID-19: http://ow.ly/ROfR30rMeE7 @AstleyCM @garyschwitzer @berthahidalgo @ADA_DiabetesPro
Shoutouts to @susan_bewley @drkevinknopf @MichaelBaum11 in this call for more than fawning coverage from press releases for these kinds of stories.
Also, linked history inside goes back 5 years just on Grail apparently trying to become Holy Grail. https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer/status/1408849696416841731
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Comments are closed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like