Patient advocate Trisha Torrey writes, “Tragic Reminders of the Uselessness of Doctor Ratings.”
She cites two examples in the news of physicians – one admitting guilt in performing fake surgeries, one cited for malpractice, poor care, bad subscribing practices – yet both got high marks on Healthgrades, Vitals, and RateMDs ratings services.
She concludes:
So what do we empowered patients learn from all this?
First – that trusting reviews on a doctor ratings website is folly. Clearly – you cannot trust them. They are people’s opinions based on things like how polite the receptionist is – NOT helpful when it comes to the need for real care.
Second – that there are ways to find a doctor and his or her credentials online that are safe and useful, including information about malpractice.
And finally – that just because a doctor is nice, does not mean he or she is competent – and vice versa. If you ask a friend for a referral to a doctor, and that friend uses the word “nice” – dig deeper!
As we move into 2014, and the Affordable Care Act kicks in, finding the right doctor is bound to become more difficult. But that does not mean we can or should take shortcuts. Read the USA Today expose cited above… it will make your toenails curl and will compel you to be very careful.
Doctors ratings are shortcuts – dangerous shortcuts. Just don’t go there.
———————
Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
Monday at #ADA2021, an infectious disease epidemiologist, a journalist, and a researcher shared perspectives on communication of risk in the era of COVID-19: http://ow.ly/ROfR30rMeE7 @AstleyCM @garyschwitzer @berthahidalgo @ADA_DiabetesPro
Shoutouts to @susan_bewley @drkevinknopf @MichaelBaum11 in this call for more than fawning coverage from press releases for these kinds of stories.
Also, linked history inside goes back 5 years just on Grail apparently trying to become Holy Grail. https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer/status/1408849696416841731
Comments (2)
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
David Williams of the Health Business Blog
September 13, 2013 at 7:29 amHave to disagree with you on this one, Gary. The case against reviews is overstated and the proposed alternatives aren’t as great as they would sound (despite the 5 SEO links to other About.com articles squeezed into the snippet you quote).
See the Health Business Blog for more: http://healthbusinessblog.com/2013/09/13/patient-reviews-dont-throw-the-baby-out-with-the-bathwater/
Gary Schwitzer
September 13, 2013 at 8:32 amDavid,
Thanks for your note.
It’s not me you’re disagreeing with. Trisha Torrey, a noted patient advocate, wrote the article and, in the spirit of fostering the open marketplace of ideas, I simply posted about her article.
And I now see that you’ve had an exchange with her on her website. Your comment…and her response…at:
http://patients.about.com/b/2013/09/11/tragic-reminders-of-the-uselessness-of-doctor-ratings.htm
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like