NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine -

Failing grades for physician quality report cards

A “state report card on transparency of physician quality information” says that despite much work on the issue of physician quality ratings, “finding information on the quality of physicians remains elusive for most consumers.” It goes on to state:

“Close to 15 years after the Institute of Medicine’s Crossing The Quality Chasm (report), we have no idea, for the most part, on the quality of care delivered by the majority of clinicians in the U.S. That’s not just shameful, it puts patients at risk every day,”

A pdf file of the report is available online.

Only Minnesota and Washington received “A” grades. Washington for its Puget Sound Alliance Community Checkup. Minnesota – for its Minnesota Healthscores. (Although, as a resident of Minnesota, I wonder how much impact this report has had on MN consumers.)

Kaiser Health News reports:

“I was shocked because I honestly thought the availability of information on the quality of physicians was far more prevalent … It’s a very mixed bag,” said Francois de Brantes, co-author of the report.

The information is becoming increasingly important as consumers face higher deductibles and out-of-pocket costs and “want a sense of whether or not that money is being spent on physicians that will deliver high quality care,” de Brantes said.

Many states had information about primary care doctors, but not specialists.

“That’s only 10 or 15 percent of the cost of care,” de Brantes said. “They now might want to focus on the rest. When patients go and have procedures done by cardiologists or orthopedists or oncologists, they deserve to know the quality of care they are going to get.”


Follow us on Twitter:

and on Facebook.


You might also like

Comments (2)

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.