I’ve grown accustomed to nearly spitting out my coffee over many things in my morning paper.
Still, an ad for an “accidental bowel leakage” product darn near had me spewing my French Roast Colombian all over the paper the other day.
First, let me emphasize that I know there’s undoubtedly a need being served by this product. And I am not belittling that need.
I am only commenting on the marketing. Just one more little observation about how health care marketing dominates our media consumption.
But I learned something. I learned that what we used to call “fecal incontinence” is now ABL. And there it is advertised in my morning paper right alongside snow tire sales and department store sales and travel agency ads trying to get me out of Minnesota in January.
So ABL joins the Hall of Fame of health care condition acronyms created largely by drug companies or others selling health care products.
Can you provide the full name for the following acronyms AND what the condition used to be called? (Quiz answers appear at the very end of this article.)
Before we give you the quiz answers, here’s news about another new marketing twist. A billboard outside the Denver Broncos’ football stadium, capitalizing on the All-Pro performance of quarterback Peyton Manning to urge men to join those who are “manning up” and having vasectomies. Thanks to Deadspin.com for bringing this to our attention.
Now, here are your quiz answers. A free vasectomy to anyone who answered them all correctly. You just have to go to Denver to pick up your prize.
OBHCM, I remain THNW.
(Overwhelmed By Health Care Marketing, I remain, The Health News Watchdog.)
———————–
Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer
https://twitter.com/healthnewsrevu
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Comments are closed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like