A story in the Cincinnati Enquirer, “Ice bucket challenge? Here’s where your money goes,” is worth a look.
It doesn’t make any statement about what’s right or wrong or good or bad about the campaign. It simply states facts, based on what the reporter found on Guidestar.org. Excerpts:
“The (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis – ALS) association pays its management $1.7 million in annual salaries, including $319,000 in total compensation for its president.
The association keeps $6.7 million in investments.
The association spent $2.4 million with three companies for professional fundraising costs in 2013.
The association spent $1.2 million for travel.
The association spent $3.2 million since 2009 to lobby legislators to “sensitize them to the plight of ALS” sufferers.
The association paid out $6.6 million in grants for research and clinical trials to attempt to cure the disease.”
A blogger who goes by Duncan Cross (he says Duncan is his real name but Cross is not), wrote, “Don’t Ice Bucket.” He explains that he was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease in high school, and since has “become more interested in the social aspects of illness, and how sick people find meaning in their lives.” His main point: “about the problem with disease charities, that they put research ahead of the real needs of people living with the disease on a day-to-day basis.”
A Boston Globe columnist wrote, “Ice Bucket Challenge a gimmick best not repeated.” Tom Keane writes that the campaign “adds a new and troubling twist. Charities have always been comfortable using guilt as a motivator — children and puppies in danger seem to work especially well. But the challenge crosses a line. Those issuing challenges are not only telling others what cause to support but also saying that if they don’t, they must suffer a penalty. Threats to compel giving? It seems the opposite of what it really means to be charitable.”
Any time something goes so wildly viral so quickly, I think it’s worthwhile to step back and assess – “Where did this come from, how did it happen, and where is it going?” That’s how important questions were raised about the Susan G. Komen Foundation “Race for the Cure” and other campaigns.
So please don’t write to me as if I’m anti-ALS fundraising. I’m not. I think these writers raise some interesting perspectives that haven’t received a lot of media attention. Period.
———————-
Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer
https://twitter.com/healthnewsrevu
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Comments are closed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like