Two headlines for same stem cell story: halting progress? Or patients dancing?

Posted By

Last week, I read with interest a New York Times piece headlined, “The Trials of Stem Cell Therapy,” with the subhead:  “Stem Cells: Plenty of Hope, but Halting Progress.”  I thought that was an appropriately cautious introduction to this issue, which has received so much hype.

“Halting” is defined as:

  • marked by a lack of sureness or effectiveness
  • stopping often because of not being sure about what to say or do; not steady

The story asked the question, “Why, then, are there not more success stories, given all the money poured into stem cell research?”

A headline again pulled me in – as headlines are made to do – when, 6 days later, the Science/Health section of my Sunday Star Tribune newspaper published the following story:

I thought to myself, “How can two such different stories come out within days of each other?”  One leads with “halting progress” while the other trumpets “Starts To Show Results” with a subhead about a heart patient who now goes dancing.

But then I realized IT WAS THE SAME STORY – just with a different headline apparently slapped on top by someone at the Star Tribune who was cobbling together pieces grabbed from others in order to flesh out its Sunday Science/Health section.

Did someone at the Strib miss the questioning tone of the original New York Times piece?  Maybe this is what happens when one publishes a Science/Health section that is almost always nearly filled with stuff that your staff didn’t write.


Follow us on Twitter:

and on Facebook.


You might also like


Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.