Last November, it was Matt Lauer and Al Roker having their prostates probed on live TV via digital rectal exam.
This November TV sweeps period – today to be precise – Willie Geist and Carson Daly had their testicles probed live on the air.
The common denominator: the prober was telegenic, media magnet Dr. David Samadi, who runs a robotic prostate surgery center in NYC.
If you have nothing else to do with the next 8 minutes, watch the Samadi show.
Click the image to see Willie Geist and Carson Daly undergo live testicular exams to check for cancer
Samadi was not challenged when he said, “We want all men between ages of 20-40 to do self-examination because when you catch testicular cancer, like any other cancer, early, it’s curable.”
In his continued pattern of nightclub humor, Samadi asked the two personalities, “Who’s going to play ball first?” After one guy went in for the exam, Samadi said, “The ball is in his court.”
Man, it’d be nice if we had more balanced information and less schlock.
Samadi encouraged men to do self exams once a month.
But Samadi has a vested interest in this.
What does the US Preventive Services Task Force say about testicular self exams? It’s simple:
“The USPSTF recommends against screening for testicular cancer in adolescent or adult men….There is inadequate evidence that screening asymptomatic patients by means of self-examination or clinician examination has greater yield or accuracy for detecting testicular cancer at more curable stages. …Screening by self-examination or clinician examination is unlikely to offer meaningful health benefits, given the very low incidence and high cure rate of even advanced testicular cancer. Potential harms include false-positive results, anxiety, and harms from diagnostic tests or procedures.”
Imbalanced and incomplete information has become the norm for NBC Today show screening promotions. Viewers deserve more and better.
——————–
Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
Come on, NY Times; you must do better than this. Important research doesn’t need hype and the “breaking news” BS doesn’t help readers or patients. https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2022/03/nyt-proclaims-breaking-news/
Our editorial team was blessed to have Sharon as a contributor during our best years. As this obit states, she was “kind, patient, wise, thoughtful and generous.” Thank you, Sharon; now rest in peace. https://journalism.wisc.edu/news/in-memoriam-sharon-dunwoody-1947-2022/
We’ve written about the hype of liquid biopsies for years (see link in comment below). And now this…. https://www.statnews.com/2022/01/12/medicare-shouldnt-cover-liquid-biopsies-early-cancer-detection/
Comments (3)
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Comments are closed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like