NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine -

Pharma payments to network TV physician-journalists – Columbia Journalism Review

I’m late on this, but it’s noteworthy.  Paul Thacker, journalist and former investigator for the US Senate Finance Committee investigating medical research conflicts of interest, published a new piece in the Columbia Journalism Review last week.  It’s entitled:

Database may uncover conflicts of interest for TV doctors – Free lunches, paid speaking gigs & free drug samples are often not disclosed by media physicians

It’s an important discussion of TV physician-journalists “offering medical advice without disclosing that they’re receiving money from the pharmaceutical industry.”

I welcome your comments.

I have written several times in the past about various ethical issues facing network TV physician journalists, although Thacker addresses a different matter.  Some of my past posts:



Follow us on Twitter:

and on Facebook.

You might also like


Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.