Pharma payments to network TV physician-journalists – Columbia Journalism Review

I’m late on this, but it’s noteworthy.  Paul Thacker, journalist and former investigator for the US Senate Finance Committee investigating medical research conflicts of interest, published a new piece in the Columbia Journalism Review last week.  It’s entitled:

Database may uncover conflicts of interest for TV doctors – Free lunches, paid speaking gigs & free drug samples are often not disclosed by media physicians

It’s an important discussion of TV physician-journalists “offering medical advice without disclosing that they’re receiving money from the pharmaceutical industry.”

I welcome your comments.

I have written several times in the past about various ethical issues facing network TV physician journalists, although Thacker addresses a different matter.  Some of my past posts:



Follow us on Twitter:

and on Facebook.

You might also like


We Welcome Comments. But please note: We will delete comments left by anyone who doesn’t leave an actual first and last name and an actual email address.

We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, or profanity. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. Comments should primarily discuss the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages about health and medicine. This is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science. Nor is it a forum to share your personal story about a disease or treatment -- your comment must relate to media messages about health care. If your comment doesn't adhere to these policies, we won't post it. Questions? Please see more on our comments policy.

Comments are closed.