NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

JACC cites our work in calling for journalists & researchers to share responsibility in protecting the public

Dr. Valentin Fuster of Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, and editor of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, cites our work in his editorial, “Journalists and Researchers: Equal Responsibility in Protecting the Public.

Excerpts of his editorial:

“Over the past 10 months in these Editor’s Pages, I have often encouraged my cardiologist colleagues to observe our responsibilities as teachers, leaders, and caregivers. However, in this Editor’s Page, I turn my attention to different guardians of society: the media. As physicians, we are required to take an oath to “do no harm” first and foremost. Even though journalists may seem removed from this responsibility to patients, they publish stories that could affect the health choices of hundreds or thousands of individuals.

(He then cites our paper in JAMA Internal Medicine last May.)

Accordingly, I would like to suggest that journalists and researchers must share equally in shouldering the burden of responsibility to improve appropriate communication about basic and clinical research.

First, there is an obligation on the part of the researchers not to inflate the importance of their findings. …

Second, researchers should take some responsibility for the creation of the press release about their research, which is written by the media or press relations department at their hospital or society. …

I recognize, however, that some journalists are not trained in statistics or clinical data; therefore, the physicians who serve as their sources need to be particularly meticulous and take the time to properly educate reporters about the data. This is the exact juncture where journalists and researchers can come together to equally share the responsibility of properly informing the public about new health research.”

Regarding his second bullet point about news releases, we will soon – perhaps as early as next week – begin publishing our systematic, criteria-driven reviews of health care related news releases.

Regarding his final point about journalists not trained in statistics or clinical data, I will again, for the 9th straight year, help conduct a workshop at the Association of Health Care Journalists annual conference trying to help journalists on some of these issues.  “How to accurately report on medical research findings,” will be offered on Thursday, April 23, at 9 a.m. at the conference. 

——————-

Follow us on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer

https://twitter.com/healthnewsrevu

and on Facebook.

You might also like

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.