HealthNewsReview.org’s 9th anniversary – that almost didn’t happen

Today is the 9th anniversary of HealthNewsReview.org. And, although we didn’t plan it this way, today is the day we introduce our new look, our new design, with some new features.

Last year, on our 8th anniversary, I thought the project was dead.

But now, with new funding from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, and with a new institutional home in the University of Minnesota School of Public Health, we’ve been able to rebuild our team of contributors and also rebuild and redesign our website. And, besides our bread-and-butter journalism reviews, we have started reviewing health care news releases – from government agencies, medical journals, medical centers, drug and device manufacturers and others.

Rather than count candles, I’ll count stories and other stats.

We have reviewed nearly 2,000 stories – 1,976 to be exact. And, as of today, we’ve now published one health care-related news release as well.  Many more of those to come.

Here’s a breakdown of how many stories got top-rated 5-star scores or any other level of grade. The star score is automatically generated based on how many of our 10 criteria were judged by our reviewers to be addressed satisfactorily in the story.

Other stats:

• Average score for all 1,976 stories:  3.07 stars

• Associated Press – 255 stories – 3.6 stars
• CNN.com – 43 stories – 2.98 stars
• HealthDay – 206 stories – 2.93 stars (I want to point out that HealthDay was highlighted twice last week for reporting the limitations of observational studies better than many competitors.) 
• Los Angeles Times – 148 stories – 3.49 stars
• New York Times – 140 stories – 3.49 stars
• NPR.org – 50 stories – 3.54 stars
• Reuters Health – 143 stories – 3.24 stars
• TIME.com – 34 stories – 2.79 stars
• US News & World Report – 32 stories – 2.97 stars
• USA Today – 63 stories – 3.46 stars
• Wall Street Journal – 117 stories – 3.39 stars
• Washington Post – 51 stories – 3.24 stars

I emphasize that as deep as our database is – and no one in the U.S. that I’m aware of has systematically tracked more stories than we have with such rigor for so long – this is still a relatively small sample from any one news organization.  We talk more about this in our “How We Rate Stories & News Releases” section.

And here’s the breakdown of how many of the 1,976 stories we’ve reviewed were judged satisfactory on each of the 10 criteria:

* Note:  the news release criterion grades are skewed in favor of satisfactory scores because in order for our reviewers to judge a story as unsatisfactory, they must have a copy of a news release in hand.  And that’s not always possible.  Thus, the large number of N/A scores. 

 With unsatisfactory grades as an average for five criteria – the ones that are arguably the most important – you can see that there’s a lot of work left to do, many more people to be reached and trained to do a better job.

I’ve already done one newsroom training workshop so far this year.  Next week, I’ll do another at the annual conference of the Association of Health Care Journalists, in Santa Clara, California. But I plan to do several more in 2015, so if you know of an interested newsroom – or an institution that writes a lot of health care news releases – let me know.

And thanks to so many of you who’ve stayed with us for 9 years.  Stick around for our teen years!