NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine -

Does the public trust science? A university communicator’s reflections

One “peek behind the curtain” of how news releases can sometimes emanate from academic medical centers – or their researchers – was provided by our managing editor Kevin Lomangino’s piece this week, “NanoKnife fight at the University of Louisville: Why a disputed news release reflects important truths about health care news.”

Another “peek behind the curtain” was published today by Kirk Englehardt, Director of Research Communication at the Georgia Institute of Technology, on his SciLogs blog. His piece was entitled, “University Communication & Trust in Science: A Peek Behind the Curtain.”

It reflected on how “the job of a university communicator has changed a lot in the past 10 years,” as Englehardt said at a recent National Academy of Sciences workshop, “Does the Public Trust Science?” – all explained in his post.

It’s a good article, which includes a video of the panel he was involved in at the NAS workshop (below) and a list of links to related resources.

Just last month, Englehardt wrote about our project’s introduction and publication of systematic reviews of health care news releases, including many by universities, in his post, “Meet the (Research) Press Release Police.

The continued, open discussion of these important issues is healthy and welcome.

You might also like


Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.