The following is a guest blog post by Sally James.
Susannah Fox was appointed the chief technical officer for the US Department of Health and Human Services in May. Many patient advocates believe she could – as she puts it – “enable patients to access their electronic health data easily and contribute it for research” and continue a movement toward giving patients a greater voice in federal policies.
She’s been called a superhero. She calls herself “a health data geek.”
In one recent example of her activities in her new role, she helped convene a White House panel last week about connecting patients better to their own health records, and the event prompted a wide social media response at the hash tag #chealth4cancer. (Connected health for cancer.) You can read a transcript of the Twitter discussion here. The event was part of a White House Champions of Change project honoring individuals who have been pioneers in using and advocating for health data access.
Fox promises to continue what her predecessor Todd Park called the “data liberacion” movement. We asked some patient advocates active in this space for years to speculate on what they believe Fox might accomplish.
“She is a big brain plus giant heart plus real soul,” said Dave DeBronkart, who is the author of a book on patient advocacy and a frequent speaker at conferences. He has known and worked with Fox for seven years. “She is totally and purely committed to changing healthcare’s reality, and she has personal and social power.” He further wrote in an email that Fox doesn’t have to manage the technical initiatives herself (buzzword concepts like electronic medical records, Blue Button, meaningful use and fast health interoperability) but will be the soul and vision. “Time will tell how it pans out, but she has the brains, soul, and heart to be the lighthouse.”
Patient advocate AnneMarie Ciccarella said Fox challenges everybody to put patients at the center of projects.
“Data access? I’m confident she will make this happen and crack the whole research landscape wide open in its wake. Patients are being called the blockbuster drug of the century and Susannah Fox is central to that movement.”
Ciccarella is known on Twitter as @chemobrainfog and blogs about breast cancer, among other topics.
Fellow data geek Audun Utengen, who is co-founder of the analytical site symplur.com, says Fox is a superhero who will fight for underrepresented voices. He says:
“Her secret power is in knowing that to raise the patients up we need better understanding of healthcare, and understanding comes from data, and that data must be available. Susannah will be a force for good in HHS, for every dataset released there is an opportunity to create a better healing model for patients and their caregivers.”
Researcher and scientist Corrie Painter, PhD, has blogged about her own diagnosis of angiosarcoma and about patient advocacy. She sees Fox as uniquely suited to carry things forward. Painter studies immunology at the Broad Institute.
“Susannah Fox has been primed for years to take on this role and to bring with it the ‘institutional knowledge’ of the engaged internet-savvy patient. She understands the power that can be harnessed by including patients throughout all aspects of health care design and reform. As a patient, I feel a sense of relief. Finally, someone who gets it is at the helm.”
Fox has worked for a decade in areas of research that involve how patients use and access health information. She worked at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and before that at Pew Research. Her appointment did not draw much criticism, but some in the information-technology industry questioned her chops with computer science.
One of her goals, as she outlined in an interview with FedScoop is to leverage families and patients with rare diseases, whom she dubs the “alpha geeks” of health care. Because of their challenges, these folks hack the health system in ways she wants to imitate and study. Here is something she said in that interview:
“There are hundreds of people who are hacking health … creating these one-off solutions that could have an audience if there was a way to unlock and unleash the potential of introducing the maker community to the community that needs these inventions and hacks,” she said. “That’s where I’m pointing ahead and saying ‘What are the possibilities? What can health care learn from makers?”
Stay tuned. This kind of Fox news – Susannah Fox’s work in her new role – will be worth watching.
Comments (3)
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
e-Patient Dave
July 14, 2015 at 11:30 amWell done, Sally! You chose an apt range of people to ask, and your post points in exactly the right direction.
Yes, we will see how it all turns out.
AnneMarie Ciccarella
July 15, 2015 at 12:21 amEchoing Dave’s remarks! You surely found a group of stakeholders, each looking through their own unique prism. Susannah has an intangible quality. She is able to speak along the entire continuum and when she is finished speaking, we are all rolling up our sleeves beside her. I’m eager to see this next chapter and I’m excited because I know “patients included” will quickly become action words and not simply buzz-chatter!
Sally James
July 16, 2015 at 1:26 pmThanks AnneMarie,
Would love you to write me or HNR anytime when you see things that are action and not buzz. Defining the difference is not always easy. This story can be updated as this develops.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like