Vox.com has established a clear pattern of solid science/health journalism. In 2015, our team applied our systematic criteria to 6 Vox stories. Four received 5-star scores, the other two received 4-star scores – one of the best performances we’ve tracked, albeit on a very small sample. In addition, our blog’s Five Star Friday feature noted Vox efforts twice.
But we all have bad days, and one for Vox was yesterday – Sunday, January 3.
Vox published one of the most clear and total reprints of a health care news release that we’ve seen by a major news organization in quite some time.
Under a “Science & Health” banner, Vox published the headline, “Giving birth can be as hard on your body as running a marathon.” That headline is one of the few things not copied directly from a University of Michigan news release from December 1, 2015.
From the news release:
“If an athlete sustained a similar injury in the field, she’d be in an MRI machine in an instant,” said Janis Miller, associate professor at the U-M School of Nursing. “We have this thing where we tell women, ‘Well, you’re six weeks postpartum and now we don’t need to see you—you’ll be fine.’ But not all women feel fine after six weeks nor are ready to go back to work, and they aren’t crazy.”
In the Vox story:
“If an athlete sustained a similar injury in the field, she’d be in an MRI machine in an instant,” said lead researcher Janis Miller, an associate professor at the University of Michigan School of Nursing. “We have this thing where we tell women, ‘Well, you’re six weeks postpartum, and now we don’t need to see you — you’ll be fine.’ But not all women feel fine after six weeks nor are ready to go back to work, and they aren’t crazy.”
From the news release:
She recalls one patient who made her particularly sad.
“I walked into my office, and before she even said ‘Hi,’ the woman told me, ‘I know it’s all my fault because I didn’t do enough Kegel exercises,'” Miller said.
In the Vox story:
She recalled a heartbreaking incident in her own practice: “I walked into my office, and before she even said hi, the woman told me, ‘I know it’s all my fault because I didn’t do enough Kegel exercises,'” Miller said.
There was no independent expert voice in the Vox story.
When the story offers hyperlinks to the “study,” it actually links only to the university news release, not to the study. When it hyperlinks to what a researcher “said,” it actually links only to the university news release with a printed quote attributed to that researcher. “Said” implies that something was said in an interview conducted by the journalist. To be accurate, the quote should have been attributed to the university news release.
Look, we know what it’s like to have to work on a holiday weekend – which is when this was published. But it’s not like somebody couldn’t have found time to do an interview and to get an independent perspective in the month between the time the news release was published and the story was published.
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Comments are closed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like