Gary Schwitzer is publisher of HealthNewsReview.org. He has worked in health care journalism for 44 years. He Tweets as @garyschwitzer, or using our project handle, @HealthNewsRevu.
I must be showing my age with my newly-rediscovered commitment to watching the network evening news each day.
A few more stories like the following, though, may break me of that habit.
This week the NBC Nightly News – and a physician-correspondent I hadn’t seen before, Dr.John Torres – reported on “New eye surgery holds promise for correcting nearsightedness.” It was framed as an alternative to LASIK surgery – supposedly less invasive.
The story employed a familiar TV news formula: one very satisfied patient, one true-believer physician, some extravagant claims not backed up by data or details. Examples:
One helpful detail included in the story: it costs about $5,000 for both eyes but is not covered by insurance. Maybe because some of these questions about evidence haven’t been sufficiently answered?
The story ends, though, with the kind of single anecdote allure that TV news loves: “Freedom from glasses, thanks to a new technique.”
But no data were provided to tell viewers how many people get freedom from eyeglasses.
From 2006-2009, we applied our 10 systematic criteria as we reviewed the morning and evening news on the air from ABC, CBS and NBC. We abandoned that practice because it was time-consuming, no one at the networks at the time seemed to be making any changes, the grades were awful and not getting any better. But we promised that we’d continue to watch, and to blog occasionally about what we see on the air. Of course, we have continued to systematically review the online website stories from ABC, CBS and NBC, as well as from CNN and Fox.
We hope that our followers will learn how to scrutinize claims, too. As you can see from this example, in the bulleted items above, the questions are simple. And only by answering questions like these do you get 20-20 vision on whether something is a big deal…or whether the evidence is still a bit blurry.
Comments (1)
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Linda Higgins, RN, MSN
June 8, 2017 at 8:35 amThank you for your insightful & honest reporting on so many health topics !! When I was in my MSN program, I learned how to evaluate studies for sample size, population, & many other criteria as to how robust the results were…or were not !! I’ve spent countless hours trying to educate people as to why results &/or studies were not valid !! Thanks again !!
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like