Note to our followers: Due to a lack of sufficient funding, HealthNewsReview.org will cease daily publication of new content at the end of 2018. Publisher Gary Schwitzer and other contributors may post new articles periodically. If you wish to donate, your gift might help keep the site available to the public for a few more years, by defraying costs of web hosting and maintenance. All of our 6,000+ published articles contain lessons to help people improve their critical thinking about health care. Read more about our change in status. And here's how to make a donation.

What you need to know about a Washington State report on health care waste

Michael Joyce is a writer-producer with HealthNewsReview.org and tweets as @mlmjoyce

unnecessary care

 

ProPublica reporter Marshall Allen opens his article about a Washington State report on unnecessary medical care like this:

It’s one of the intractable financial boondoggles of the U.S. health care system: Lots and lots of patients get lots and lots of tests and procedures they don’t need.

The authors from the Washington Health Alliance who published “First, Do No Harm: Calculating Health Care Waste in Washington State,” open their report like this:

Harm to patients can come in multiple forms. While harm is not intentional, it is particularly troublesome when it is a result of care that was unnecessary in the first place.

The same is true of health care journalism that contributes to this harm. While reporters don’t intend to cause harm, it’s particularly troublesome when it is the result of reporting that was not comprehensive and skeptical enough in the first place.

How often do we see reporting that hypes or promotes screening that is not evidence-based? A lot.

Journalists shouldn’t take their audiences down the path of unnecessary tests

What you’re not being told about ‘free’ public head and neck cancer screening events

TV station should stop promoting questionable screening tests at MN State Fair

The report does well in reminding us that beyond physical harms, there are usually inevitable emotional and financial harms that come into play. Stop and consider what a falsely positive test for cancer might feel like. Maybe you, or someone you know, is among the 45 percent of Americans who say they would struggle to cover an unexpected $500 medical bill.

Reporter Allen’s article — which was carried by both NPR and Kaiser Health News — speculates on what might be driving such alarming overuse and waste. One contributing factor is brought up by H. Gilbert Welch, MD of the Dartmouth Institute:

The medical system is still dominated by a payment system that pays providers for doing tests and procedures. Incentives matter … as long as people are paid more to do more, they will tend to do too much.

There are other factors to consider. How often do we as patients insist our doctors do something? Maybe prescribe something? And what role do doctors play? We know of their time constraints — and some providers do order things ‘just to be sure,’ or to avoid a lawsuit — but what about this emerging trend of offering financial incentives based on their patient satisfaction scores? Could this lead to ordering tests, or prescribing medicines, simply to curry favor and, therefore, increase income?

These are just a handful of many questions raised by this report. A report that speaks to a malignancy in our health care system that is clearly metastatic and untreated.

You might also like

Comments

We Welcome Comments. But please note: We will delete comments left by anyone who doesn’t leave an actual first and last name and an actual email address.

We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, or profanity. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. Comments should primarily discuss the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages about health and medicine. This is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science. Nor is it a forum to share your personal story about a disease or treatment -- your comment must relate to media messages about health care. If your comment doesn't adhere to these policies, we won't post it. Questions? Please see more on our comments policy.

Comments are closed.