Mary Chris Jaklevic is a reporter-editor at HealthNewsReview.org. She tweets as @mcjaklevic.
We’ve often highlighted the perils of superficial reporting on observational studies claiming to show health benefits from alcohol.
Likewise with an analysis published this week in The Lancet that focused not on the benefits but the harms of alcohol consumption, drawing on data from hundreds of studies.
That research drew dozens of misleading and unequivocal headlines, like these:
Of eight stories we looked at, none mentioned the weaknesses of observational data, which can’t prove cause and effect.
In fact, some stories pumped up the validity of the findings, stressing that researchers attempted to correct for weaknesses in previous studies on global alcohol use.
For example, Newsweek reported the lead author’s assertion that the analysis “is believed to be the largest collection of evidence on alcohol consumption, and the paper introduced several new methodological advancements to calculate the risks carried by drinking alcohol.” Newsweek offered no independent reaction.
Some stories included a quote from an accompanying editorial by Dr. Robyn Burton of King’s College London who said the conclusions were “clear and unambiguous.” That is a statement that can rarely be applied to any single study, and certainly not to one based on observational data.
The UK Guardian and CNN included a skeptical take from David Spiegelhalter, the Winton Professor for the Public Understanding of Risk at the University of Cambridge. He downplayed the report and accompanying calls for governments to consider recommending abstention.
“There is no safe level of driving, but governments do not recommend that people avoid driving,” Spiegelhalter was quoted saying. “Come to think of it, there is no safe level of living, but nobody would recommend abstention.”
CBS newscasters, who were glum about the study (a common theme we saw), introduced the findings as “bad news for whose who enjoy a glass of wine or beer” only to end the report by noting that alcohol is part of the Mediterranean diet. “Let’s go back and study that,” one of the anchors said.
As is often the case, the reality is more muddled: While this study may advance understanding about the global impact of alcohol, it comes with a few big limitations that readers need to know about.
That may not make for the sexiest headlines, but it’s at least accurate.
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Comments are closed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like