Note to our followers: Due to a lack of sufficient funding, HealthNewsReview.org will cease daily publication of new content at the end of 2018. Publisher Gary Schwitzer and other contributors may post new articles periodically. If you wish to donate, your gift might help keep the site available to the public for a few more years, by defraying costs of web hosting and maintenance. All of our 6,000+ published articles contain lessons to help people improve their critical thinking about health care. Read more about our change in status. And here's how to make a donation.

What you need to know about yet another study on Alzheimer’s and exercise

Michael Joyce is a writer-producer with HealthNewsReview.org and tweets as @mlmjoyce

Including “exercise” and “Alzheimer’s” in the same headline is sure-fire clickbait for a lot of people. For example:

150 minutes of exercise every week can reduce risk of Alzheimer’s disease (The Economic Times)

Exercise may delay rare form of Alzheimer’s (HealthDay)

But these headlines refer to a study published earlier this week that doesn’t justify such strongly suggestive wording. Here’s why.

The study

The researchers evaluated 275 people with “autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease” (ADAD), an inherited form of the disorder that represents less than 1% of all Alzheimer’s, and most often leads to symptoms of dementia by age 50. They wanted to see if exercising more than 150 minutes each week was associated with differences on cognitive/functional tests, as well as biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) surrounding the brain of patients with ADAD.

They found that, when compared to those with low physical activity (‘PA’ < 150 minutes/week), the high PA group (>150 minutes/week) performed slightly better on cognitive tests, and showed a drop in the tau protein biomarker associated with Alzheimer’s.  

Researchers used a hypothetical, mathematical model — based on the onset of dementia in first-degree relatives with the disorder — to estimate when they thought those with ADAD would develop signs of dementia, and found that those who exercised more showed signs of  “very mild dementia” earlier than expected.

The limitations

But there are several key limitations of this “observational, cross-sectional” study design that may limit just how clinically relevant these findings really are.

association is not the same as causationFirst, as we have written about before, this study cannot tease apart which way causality (if any) runs: Does exercise actually protect against dementia? Or do those who have dementia exercise less?

Second, a cross-sectional study examines a single point in time. That means for a progressive disease like Alzheimer’s, making projections about delaying or slowing the disease — as both news stories above suggest — is hypothetical and not proven by the study’s findings.

Third, changes in levels of biomarkers associated with Alzheimer’s disease (like tau or beta-amyloid) have not been proven to determine patients’ cognition or functional status. [Read more about surrogate markers in Alzheimer’s research here.]

Also, the touted benefits of exercise are based on cognitive test results that — although statistically significant —  are incomplete measures of cognition and functional status and don’t necessarily translate to “thwarted mental decline” as claimed in the HealthDay article.

Finally, researchers relied upon subjects self-reporting their type and estimated duration of exercise, but not the intensity. This is both unreliable and hard to reproduce.

The take-home message

Just because this study cannot prove cause-and-effect doesn’t make it a ‘bad’ study. But longer-term, randomized controlled studies are needed before clear links between exercise and dementia can be established.

“There’s quite a body of work building up now that shows beneficial effects of exercise on cognition,” said Susan Molchan, MD, a psychiatrist and former NIH clinical researcher who studied Alzheimer’s disease.

“There’ve been a few randomized controlled trials, though the results are not completely consistent. Not all of them have shown a benefit but, then again, none of them have shown a risk. I’m glad to see non-drug interventions being explored. And it doesn’t hurt to exercise as long as you do it safely and within your own limits.”

In other words, there are plenty of evidence-based reasons to get over 150 minutes of aerobic exercise every week. But, at this time, “thwarting” Alzheimer’s isn’t one of them. 

You might also like

Comments

We Welcome Comments. But please note: We will delete comments left by anyone who doesn’t leave an actual first and last name and an actual email address.

We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, or profanity. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. Comments should primarily discuss the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages about health and medicine. This is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science. Nor is it a forum to share your personal story about a disease or treatment -- your comment must relate to media messages about health care. If your comment doesn't adhere to these policies, we won't post it. Questions? Please see more on our comments policy.