Gary Schwitzer is founder and publisher of HealthNewsReview.org. He tweets as @garyschwitzer.
It took the Joslin Diabetes Center four paragraphs and three mentions of fathers – as in, “how a father’s exercise regimen would affect his offspring’s metabolic health” – to finally mention that its research news release was about mouse fathers.
Ohio State Medical Center – home to the study’s co-author – led with this in its news release:
Men who want to have children in the near future should consider hitting the gym.
Way down at the bottom of the news release – 13 paragraphs and 422 words later, at the very end, is this researcher quote:
“There’s potential for this to translate to humans.”
Yes, potential. And that’s about all it is at this point. While, meantime, the human father imagery implies much more than mouse research potential. EurekAlert! – which distributes many academic research news releases for a fee, compounded the error by publishing the Ohio State news release complete with a video of a human father who, according to the video script, “didn’t know that his active lifestyle may have given his children a head start on their health before they were born.”
In writing about the study, Psychology Today’s headline was “Soon-to-Be Dads Who Exercise May Have Healthier Kids.” And while the story took only five words to mention mice, the next words made this leap of faith:
A new study on mice could provide some exercise-related motivation for wannabe fathers to get off the couch and start working out prior to conceiving a baby.
Really? Would you really expect or want a wannabe father to jump off the couch in response to a mouse study?
How could/should the study have been reported – if, that is, it was newsworthy at all at this point? We point to how Science magazine put mice in the headline:
When fathers exercise, their future offspring may benefit, mouse study suggests
And in its second sentence:
Whether the results hold true for humans remains uncertain, but they support the notion that some of the benefits of exercise are somehow passed on to the next generation.
And ending with a quote from an independent reproductive biologist:
Lane cautions that researchers don’t know whether exercise provides the same benefits in people, so it may be too early for would-be fathers to start training for marathons.
Uncertain. Too early. Far less than proof that a human Dad has (or needs) a new reason to get off the couch and hit the gym.
Comments (1)
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Margaret Owen Thorpe
October 29, 2018 at 10:08 pmMaybelline, small black cat and champion mouser, wants to know where those mouse daddies work out. She thinks mice that exercise will be tastier than those that don’t and hopes they’ll be so intent on their Fitbits that they won’t notice her coming up behind….
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like