NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

Tags: lung cancer

12/18/2018

Summary of CRISPR lung cancer research downplays the work that lies ahead

7/25/2017

MD Anderson gives proton therapy careful treatment in study recap

6/20/2017

Study doesn’t back claims about radiation in elderly lung cancer patients

3/27/2017

Stereotactic radiation for elderly lung cancer patients: release makes unjustified claims

3/7/2017

Lung cancer test based on “a simple blood draw”? There’s no such thing

6/14/2016

Reviewers sniff out problems with release on lung cancer breath test

4/4/2016

Duke University offers strong data-driven release on lung cancer screenings for former smokers