This news release summarizes findings from a recently published study on the effects of a dairy-supplemented Mediterranean diet on heart disease risk factors in 41 high risk patients.
The news release neglects to provide readers with important study details like the types of dairy products consumed, while misreporting others, like how much dairy was consumed on average each day. It also neglected to note that the study was partially funded by an industry trade group (Dairy Australia) or to provide any context on the effects of the dairy-supplemented diet on heart disease risk factors leaving readers in the dark about the diet’s ultimate effectiveness.
According to the World Health Organization, heart disease is the leading cause of death globally. Several lifestyle factors contribute to heart disease risk with one being diet. Making healthy dietary choices can significantly lower heart disease risk but individuals need accurate and comprehensive information in order to make these choices.
If a dairy-supplemented Mediterranean diet was proved effective at reducing heart disease risk that would be useful for the public to know. Unfortunately, readers won’t find the details of the study in this news release.
The news release doesn’t discuss the costs of adhering to a dairy-supplemented Mediterranean diet. However, many people know the costs for typical Mediterranean diet food items like nuts, fruits, and fish and dairy products like milk and cheese.
A statistically significant reduction in blood pressure doesn’t always translate to a clinically significant reduction. This release doesn’t make that distinction for readers. It mentions that a dairy-supplemented Mediterranean diet significantly improved blood pressure, heart rate, cholesterol, mood and cognitive function, but it doesn’t describe how much each outcome improved.
The release doesn’t address harms from a dairy enriched diet.
Since the release is encouraging greater dairy consumption, including up to 4 servings of cheese a day, it would be important to mention that there are potential harms from consuming more saturated fats found in many dairy products.
The research involved a randomized crossover design but there’s no mention of this in the news release. There’s also no discussion of the small sample of 41 volunteers which limits the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, readers don’t learn what types of dairy products were consumed, such as Greek yogurt and full and reduced fat cheese slices. The release also misreports the number of dairy servings consumed per day. It was not 2-3 servings per day as listed but 3-4 servings per day with participants averaging 3 servings per day, according to the study.
Finally, the study was just 8 weeks long. Findings from such a short study may be considered surrogate endpoints, not clinical ones. To claim a clinical benefit would require a much longer study.
There is no evidence of disease mongering in this release. The release provides useful context on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in Australia and globally.
The news release didn’t include funding information. It should have noted that the research received funding from Dairy Australia, an industry trade group, as well as government and foundation grants.
There’s no discussion about how the effectiveness of a dairy-supplemented Mediterranean diet might compare to a traditional Mediterranean diet as it relates to heart disease risk. The release claims a dairy-supplemented Mediterranean diet “is more effective” than a low-fat diet but offers no data to back up the claim.
Although the news release doesn’t discuss availability, it’s generally understood that items for a dairy-supplemented Mediterranean diet can likely be found in many grocery stores.
The news release doesn’t explain how the diet is novel or discuss whether other research has examined how a dairy-supplemented Mediterranean diet impacts heart disease risk.
The news release begins by stating that a dairy-supplemented Mediterranean diet “will significantly increase health outcomes for those at risk of cardiovascular disease – and it’s even more effective than a low-fat diet.” However, a definitive statement like this should not be made based on a single randomized trial with a small sample. (And without an explanation of what “significantly” actually amounts to.) More appropriate language would be that a dairy-supplemented Mediterranean diet may improve the risk of heart disease.
Systematic, Criteria-Driven
Puleeeeease... this 'game changer' weight loss drug causes more nausea and vomiting than a placebo. Some game, some change. My friend Gary would spank you for using the eighth word medical reporters should never, ever use. @garyschwitzer @thackerpd
https://www.healthnewsreview.org/toolkit/just-journalists-writing-tips-case-studies/7-words-and-more-you-shouldnt-use-in-medical-news/ https://twitter.com/OttawaCitizen/status/1361426796126830597
A scary @statnews Op-Ed warns that govt attempts to rein in Pharma may cut off access to "life-changing" drugs.
It takes @garyschwitzer to let us know: the author spent 10 years as Pfizer's public-policy chief. https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer/status/1360325022578053123
.@TranspariMED criticizes STAT op-ed for not disclosing pharma funding of author’s institute - similar to criticism we’ve made of STAT op-eds in the past. @transparify @ThinkTankWatch @icer_review https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2021/02/transparency-watchdog-criticizes-stats-non-disclosure-on-pro-pharma-op-ed/
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like