May 4, 2017
Podcast: Why would a 23-year-old graduate student choose to live in a nursing home?
Michael Joyce is a multimedia producer at HealthNewsReview.org and tweets as @mlmjoyce
About 6 percent of older Americans live in nursing homes. However, nearly half of us over the age of 65 will spend some time in a nursing home at some point in our life.
News stories about nursing homes and the elderly most commonly address themes such as abuse and neglect, delivery of medical care, financial and reimbursement issues, and staffing challenges.
But for many who live in nursing homes — or have loved ones who live there — the most important issues have to do with quality of life. Things like: privacy, dignity, food, activities, autonomy, security, relationships and comfort.
These are things Tetyana Shippee knows about first hand … even though she is only in her thirties. And this is her story:
In the podcast you’ll hear Dr. Shippee, an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health, refer to these resources which are quite helpful in choosing a nursing home:
Medicare Nursing Home Report Cards
Minnesota Nursing Home Report Cards
Here are some links to the research that came from Dr. Shippee’s experience living in the nursing home:
With regard to journalists being embedded in nursing homes, there are some fascinating examples:
An article published last month by STAT about the value of young people living in retirement communities.
There’s a wealth of excellent reporting. These collections are great starting points:
You can find all our podcasts HERE.
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like