Mary Chris Jaklevic is a reporter-editor at HealthNewsReview.org. She tweets as @mcjaklevic.
A trip to the emergency department is never a welcome experience, but it can be made worse — or even triggered by — a patient’s unrealistic expectations.
In this podcast, veteran emergency doctors Jerome Hoffman, M.D., and Greg Henry, M.D., discuss how misleading media messages can feed health care myths that lead to patient harms, and what patients and physicians can do about it.
Hoffman is a professor emeritus of medicine/emergency medicine at UCLA, and a former director of the school’s emergency medicine residency program.
Henry is a clinical professor in emergency medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School and a past president of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), which happens to be celebrating its 50th anniversary this year.
Greg Henry, M.D.
Both are prolific writers and lecturers who’ve helped to shape the practice of emergency medicine since it was officially recognized as a medical specialty in 1979.
Once dismissed as a non-serious medical career path, emergency medicine is now a sought-after profession that affords doctors the opportunity to treat all kinds of patients.
It’s also ground zero for observing systemic problems such as overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
Those problems, they say, often stem from myths such as more is better, earlier is better, and technology will save us.
They discuss:
Jerome Hoffman, M.D.
While urging patients and their families to be skeptical, Hoffman and Henry also stress the ability of emergency medicine to do good. They say emergency providers can help nearly every patient who comes through their doors in some way.
This podcast is part of HealthNewsReview.org’s series on how real patients are harmed by misleading media messages. See more stories like this, or share your own, on our series page.
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like