Professional definition: Radiologists are doctors who specialize in diagnosing and treating diseases and injuries using medical imaging techniques, such as x-rays, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear medicine, positron emission tomography (PET) and ultrasound.
Dr. Saurabh Jha says his profession can be both the arsonist and the firefighter with overdiagnosis.
Jha, a radiologist at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, was guest editor of a special Overdiagnosis Issue of the journal, Academic Radiology, in August. He wrote:
“It is not surprising that radiologists, who are physicians tasked with the diagnosis of disease, find themselves implicated in overdiagnosis. What is surprising is the scarcity of an exposition of overdiagnosis in the radiology literature. Indeed, the issue is not only infrequently discussed but also considered controversial. This is all the more incredulous as radiologists are experts in diagnosis and know the limitations of a diagnostic test. Radiologists do not question the existence of false positives….It is time radiologists thought about overdiagnosis.”
Jha is active on Twitter under the name @RogueRad. Earlier this year, he engaged in a blogging back-and-forth with billionaire Mark Cuban over the latter’s Tweet that “If you can afford to have your blood tested for everything available, do it quarterly so you have a baseline of your own personal health.” Jha wrote: “He has taken the fads of modern healthcare, personalized medicine, big data and early diagnosis, and extrapolated it to nonsensical proportions.”
We met at the Preventing Overdiagnosis 2015 conference at the National Institutes of Health this month.
Click on the arrow below to hear our podcast discussion with him.
Other resources:
Music excerpts used in this piece:
Thanks to Cristeta Boarini for her editing on this podcast.
You can now subscribe to the Health News Watchdog podcast, which is indexed and searchable on the iTunes Store, at: https://itun.es/i6S86Qw.
Or you can subscribe to the RSS feed for the podcasts: http://feeds.soundcloud.com/users/soundcloud:users:167780656/sounds.rss
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.