November 13, 2017
Podcast: Victor Montori – Mayo Clinic MD calls for patient revolution
Michael Joyce is a writer-producer for HealthNewsReview.org and tweets as @mlmjoyce
Having a conversation with Victor Montori you can almost feel your hair blow back.
If he were introduced at a medical conference you’d probably get something like this: Mayo Clinic diabetes physician, author of roughly 600 publications, world-class expert in shared decision-making and evidence-based medicine, director of Mayo’s Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, and an advisor to The BMJ and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
But in person you get this: a working wisdom of the U.S. medical industrial complex, placed in pragmatic perspective by a frontline physician who actually studies the patient-doctor relationship (yes, patient before doctor) … all fueled by high octane passion.
It’s on full display in this podcast. Simply acknowledging that our $3 trillion health care industry is broken doesn’t cut it with Montori. He wants to fix it. Here’s how …
Montori sees his book — Why We Revolt: A Patient Revolution for Careful and Kind Care — as the starting point of a much-needed conversation.
You can buy the book — and share your story — at patientrevolution.org.
We cover shared decision-making often. Of the dozens of articles we’ve written on the topic, this one by our publisher, Gary Schwitzer, is an excellent starting point.
As for evidence-based medicine, here’s a compelling video of a Victor Montori presentation at the University of Oxford in June of 2016. It explores how can we understand and apply scientific evidence in the context of Montori’s patient revolution.
The Health News Watchdog podcasts cover a wide range of topics. Just this year alone we have talked with a former US Senator about health care reform. We’ve asked whether wellness programs really work. We’ve taken dubious stem cell clinics to task. You can find these and the rest of our podcasts HERE.
If you like what you hear, leave us a comment or rating. Maybe you have an idea for a future podcast. We’d love to hear it and we’d love to hear from you!
Comments (4)
We Welcome Comments. But please note: We will delete comments left by anyone who doesn’t leave an actual first and last name and an actual email address.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, or profanity. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. Comments should primarily discuss the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages about health and medicine. This is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science. Nor is it a forum to share your personal story about a disease or treatment -- your comment must relate to media messages about health care. If your comment doesn't adhere to these policies, we won't post it. Questions? Please see more on our comments policy.
Rob Oliver
November 13, 2017 at 10:41 amSomeone who works at the Mayo Clinic has the stones to complain about the “medical industrial complex”?
The Mayo Clinic (and now Cleavland Clinic) is the American poster child of entrpreneurial medicine and self promotion for the better part of a century. They are relentless promoters of a brand.
Michael Joyce
November 13, 2017 at 1:14 pmDr. Oliver,
Thank you for sharing your concern regarding how the Mayo Clinic (and as you note, ‘and now Cleavland [sic] Clinic’) can be ‘relentless promoters of a brand’. Not infrequently we share similar concerns, or — at the very least — we critique something they do which we find potentially misleading or harmful to consumers. If you search our website with either institution’s name you will find dozens of instances we have been highly critical of both.
But allow me to critique your reaction to Dr. Montori. First, he is not ‘complaining’ about the medical industrial complex. He rigorously studies it and is committed to being part of the solution, not part of the problem. Second, although it is true that Dr. Montori is an employee of the Mayo Clinic, this is a self-published book and not a publication of the Mayo Clinic.
Finally, if you listened to the podcast, thank you. My goal was to reveal the thinking and passion of this remarkable physician. My sense in speaking with him was that he was trying to promote much needed change, not his employer. That comes through in the book as well which — if you get a chance to read it — might change your opinion of him as either complaining or promoting a brand.
Selver Maric
November 14, 2017 at 8:17 amRob Oliver, please read a book first than comment about it.
This book is greater than Mayo Clinic, he is a first doctor who really step forward and say what really happens on the other side of big healthcare walls. Being entrepreneurial isn’t problem of medicine, medicine stopped to care for patients – that’s a real problem.
Charles L Carter
November 15, 2017 at 8:46 amDr Montori’s heart is really in the right place. But implicit in his argument is that few doctors share his values of kindness and shared decision making. In med school in the 80’s, I was told the days of patriarchal medicine should be left behind. Shared decision making is a re-branding of this concept, not wrong or bad in itself but not especially new. Each patient and each situation are different and many patients will say, “Just make me better “. Engaging them in their health, especially for chronic illness, can be a challenge though vital.
Dr Montori’s credibility suffers somewhat as well from his specialty. Regimens for diabetics are among the most demanding and are among those promoted with relatively weak evidence.
Doctors certainly warrant encouragement such as Dr Montori’s advises, but the real solution lies in payment models,loan forgiveness, and diminishing regulatory burdens to promote primary care. More PCP’s and more time for them to actually interact with patients in an unstructured way would go very far to advancing his ideas. And specialists acting as consultants rather than long term managers of their slice of a patient.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like