NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.
Read Original Story

Weighing in on lipolysis

Rating

5 Star

Weighing in on lipolysis

Our Review Summary

This long (3,000 words! – yes, some papers still give that much space) story is well written and appropriately addresses the full range of our evaluation criteria.  It covers some of the issues surrounding cosmetic injection procedures for management of fat bulges.  The procedures are variously called injection lipolysis, lipodissolve ormesotherapy.  The story makes it very clear that the materials used in these injections do not have FDA approval for this purpose and that there is little scientific data demonstrating efficacy.  The story does a good job of providing a sense of the personal motivation that entices individuals to consider this treatment.  And it provides quotes from several physicians who indicate clear concerns about the safety of the procedure.

While such stories often have a "buyer beware" flavor suggesting professional credentialing may be the key to positive outcomes – this piece was clear that there is no key to positive outcomes in this case.

It earns one of our top 5-star scores. 

Criteria

Does the story adequately discuss the costs of the intervention?

Satisfactory

The story provided a range of cost estimates from the experience of two consumers and what was termed the largest national provider of the procedure.

Does the story adequately quantify the benefits of the treatment/test/product/procedure?

Satisfactory

The story quotes several physicians who state that the use of this procedure is way ahead of the science supporting it. It definitely gives the reader the sense that we lack studies that would quantify the benefits of treatment.

Does the story adequately explain/quantify the harms of the intervention?

Satisfactory

The story provides examples for the range of harms that may result from this treatment.

Does the story seem to grasp the quality of the evidence?

Satisfactory

The evidence presented in this story is anecdotal.  But the article mentions the lack of good evidence about efficacy and safety, and it also notes that two companies are pursuing clinical trials.

Does the story commit disease-mongering?

Satisfactory

The story did not engage in disease mongering.

Does the story use independent sources and identify conflicts of interest?

Satisfactory

The story draws on individual testimony as well as interview material with physicians involved in the use of this procedure (both pro and con) and individuals involved in the manufacture of the material used in the procedure.

Does the story compare the new approach with existing alternatives?

Satisfactory

The story mentions diet and exercise as well as liposuction for reduction in adipose tissue.

Does the story establish the availability of the treatment/test/product/procedure?

Satisfactory

The story detailed the range of providers from whom this intervention is available.  The lack of FDA approval is mentioned in the first paragraph.

Does the story establish the true novelty of the approach?

Satisfactory

The story provides a historical context for this treatment.

Does the story appear to rely solely or largely on a news release?

Satisfactory

Does not appear to rely on a press release.

Total Score: 10 of 10 Satisfactory

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.