NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.
Read Original Story

Lose weight while you sleep?

Rating

0 Star

Lose weight while you sleep?

Our Review Summary

Oh, how the publishers of Glamour magazine must love NBC for the free publicity.  

The magazine puts seven women through a loose little experiment.

And – based on their experiences – NBC’s medical editor draws conclusions like the projection that they “will probably add about seven years to their life, based on the fact that they figured out good sleep pattern.”

So Glamour got 5.5 minutes of free publicity for its pseudo-science, promoted to the hilt by NBC’s chief medical editor.

The segment even accentuated one of the confounders – that the woman who lost 15 pounds admitted she exercised more and made dietary changes.  Yet the segment wanted to attribute all of the weight loss to sleep.

Further adding to the confusion was the on-air discussion of leptin as a “magic hormone” while the on-screen graphic was displaying the name of the hormone ghrelin.  

Whatever.  The segment put us to…. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Criteria

Does the story adequately discuss the costs of the intervention?

Not Applicable

Cost really doesn’t apply in this case.

Does the story adequately quantify the benefits of the treatment/test/product/procedure?

Not Satisfactory

The benefits were presented as occurring in 100% of the individuals studied; there was a statement made that the weight loss of the 7 women in the study ranged from 6- 15 pounds.

The medical correspondent also informed the participants that they had added 7 years to their life.

It is unclear that there is actually any scientific data substantiating these claims.

Does the story adequately explain/quantify the harms of the intervention?

Not Applicable

Harms not really applicable in this case. 

Does the story seem to grasp the quality of the evidence?

Not Satisfactory

The segment clearly explained the source of this information.   Glamour magazine got a group of 7 women to follow some sleep guidelines.  The medical correspondent should have taken the opportunity to help viewers understand the limitations of what can be learned by simply examining the experience of 7 individuals.

This sort of ‘evidence’ does not qualify as an objective investigation of how sleep affects body weight.

In addition, the medical correspondent said that the science about the link between weight and sleep time was ‘concrete’. This is does not provide the viewer with any information about the strength of the research that has been done on this topic. The medical correspondent also added that ‘we know if you get five hours sleep, you end up adding 200 calories to your diet’ without indicating anything about what supports this contention.

Does the story commit disease-mongering?

Not Satisfactory

63% of Americans don’t get enough sleep – says who?

Does the story use independent sources and identify conflicts of interest?

Not Satisfactory

There was no insight by clinicians working in the field of sleep medicine.

Does the story compare the new approach with existing alternatives?

Not Satisfactory

This segment discussed only consecutive hours of sleep.  Is this the only format in which individuals can obtain adequate sleep? Are there other things an individual can do that would serve the same function as 7.5 hrs of sleep? We don’t know because the story did not explore whether there might be other options.

Would power naps add to the total?

With exercise, for example, studies have now shown that several small periods of exercise are as good as 30 consecutive minutes.   But, in line with our critique overall, this segment just didn’t discuss data-driven evidence. 

Does the story establish the availability of the treatment/test/product/procedure?

Not Applicable

Availability doesn’t apply in this case.

Does the story establish the true novelty of the approach?

Not Satisfactory

The segment did not have any information about how long the association between sleep and weight has been under study.  Was the viewer supposed to think that Glamour magazine was the first group in the world to tackle this association?

Does the story appear to rely solely or largely on a news release?

Not Satisfactory

This story was based on a magazine article.  It seems more like a plug for the magazine than a serious effort to communicate validated scientific information to the viewers.  Not independent journalism – pretty much the same as taking news from a news release.

Total Score: 0 of 7 Satisfactory

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.