Liver supplements don’t seem to offer protection
Reviewed By
Rating

Liver supplements don’t seem to offer protection
Our Review Summary
This engaging piece examines the claims that milk thistle is a natural detoxicant that is good for the liver and enhances vitality. The story nicely summarizes—and then debunks—the claims that commercially available brands found in the local health food store are likely to help much.
Why This Matters
The market for herbal supplements is huge, but the marketing is largely unregulated and fueled by dubious claims. This piece does a nice job of explaining why one supplement may not live up to the hype.
Criteria
Satisfactory
The costs are so clearly stated that an enterprising reader could calculate them down to pennies per milligram of silymarin, the antioxidant in milk thistle that is believed to protect the liver from harm.
Satisfactory
According to the story, there don’t appear to be any benefits to quantify. It offers one example of how researchers have measured this absence of benefit. For a piece whose purpose is to examine the research behind a medical claim, the reporting feels a bit light when it comes to evaluating the evidence.
Satisfactory
The story points out that adding other herbs and ingredients to milk thistle may uNPRedictably alter the way silymarin works, and suggests that the long-term safety of silymarin needs more research.
Not Satisfactory
The story provides hints about the types of studies that have tested the potential benefits of silymarin, and employs articulate and appropriately skeptical sources to interpret the meaning of the research. However, a systematic review on this topic concluded that the herbal supplement provided no clear benefit. When you have that kind of evidence available, you should cite it.
Satisfactory
The story’s transparency, good-humored homage to the liver (“let’s take a moment to honor the liver, the best detox device a body can have”) and sensible advice (“go easy on the Tylenol and tequila”) are reassuring to readers too-often bludgeoned with scary marketing about modern life’s toxic threats.
Satisfactory
The balance feels about right. Web sites selling milk thistle tout its prowess. Two researchers weigh the evidence and find it wanting.
Satisfactory
The story points out that one option to protecting the liver with herbs that don’t seem to work is “to avoid bombarding it with too many poisons in the first place.” The story doesn’t mention medical treatments for alcoholic liver disease, fatty liver disease, Hepatitis C, or other diseases that put the liver at dire risk of failure—though this is arguably beyond the scope of the piece.
Satisfactory
The story makes is abundantly clear that milk thistle is widely available in drug and health food stores.
Satisfactory
The story leaves the accurate impression that milk thistle and silymarin are not new, though their properties still remain inadequately evaluated.
Satisfactory
The story does not appear to rely solely or largely on a news release.
Total Score: 9 of 10 Satisfactory
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like