NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.
Read Original Story

Tai Chi May Help Ease Fibromyalgia

Rating

2 Star

Tai Chi May Help Ease Fibromyalgia

Our Review Summary

This story (one of five we reviewed on this study) summarizes the findings of a recent study into the potential of benefits of tai chi for patients suffering from fibromyalgia. Though somewhat longer than all but one of the other stories under review, the story provides only a surface look into the merits of the research and the circumstances of the condition.

 

Why This Matters

 A study like this will have so many people reading the coverage that it is important for reporters to fully explain the study’s limitations and the context around the condition and its possible therapies.

Criteria

Does the story adequately discuss the costs of the intervention?

Not Satisfactory

 The story does not mention costs. 

Does the story adequately quantify the benefits of the treatment/test/product/procedure?

Not Satisfactory

The story does not attempt to quantify benefits. Readers are left to make their own assumptions about what percentage of fibromyalgia patients in the US might benefit from tai chi classes.

Does the story adequately explain/quantify the harms of the intervention?

Not Satisfactory

The story does not identify any possible harms. It is difficult to imagine that twice-weekly tai chi, like any other form of moderate exercise, would be harmful, but, at a minimum, the story could have reported upon the study’s adverse events registry. The NEJM authors clearly state: "No adverse events were noted during the study interventions." The study did not consider worse muscle soreness to be an adverse event so long as it resolved before 3 days’ time, so we don’t know how much of that occurred in either arm of the study. So why not drop in a line about the lack of adverse events? Wouldn’t a reader be interested that this exercise appears safe?

Does the story seem to grasp the quality of the evidence?

Not Satisfactory

 The results publicized here are based on a small study of 66 fibromyalgia patients who were followed for a few months. The story does not discuss any of the limitations associated with a study of this nature. In addition, the story does not include any information about the group of patients who received wellness education training followed by gentle stretching instead of tai chi, so there is no point of comparison.

Does the story commit disease-mongering?

Not Satisfactory

The story cites a questionable statistic about the scope of problem. Citing the National Fibromyalgia Association, the story says there are approximately 10 million sufferers of the condition in the U.S. It would have been more appropriate to rely on a number from an disinterested government source. (The National Institutes of Health estimates 5 million as the disease prevalence among adults over 18.)

Does the story use independent sources and identify conflicts of interest?

Satisfactory

The story does cite the opinions of a researcher who wrote an accompanying article in the journal. More outside voices would have been a nice addition. This criterion is barely satisfactory.

Does the story compare the new approach with existing alternatives?

Not Satisfactory

 Very brief mention is given to existing alternatives, such as exercise, sleep techniques and medication, but no discussion of the track record of how well the alternative methods work. 

Does the story establish the availability of the treatment/test/product/procedure?

Not Satisfactory

Readers are left to make their own assumptions about the availability of tai chi classes in their communities. More problematic is that the story does not provide any detail about the style or rigor of the tai chi classes (aside from the fact that the classes last an hour), making it difficult for a patient, or health care advisor, to make an informed decision as to how to proceed.

Does the story establish the true novelty of the approach?

Satisfactory

 The story explains that doctors routinely recommend exercise as one method of treatment for fibromyalgia patients, but with limited success. So in that sense, the story does undercut some of the novelty of the study’s findings. An excellent question for the researchers would have been: What is it that potentially makes tai chi a better form of exercise for this condition?

Does the story appear to rely solely or largely on a news release?

Satisfactory

 The story is based on an study appearing in the New England Journal of Medicine. The writer did contact the lead author and another researcher for quotes. 

Total Score: 3 of 10 Satisfactory

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.