This article is an attempt to educate readers about a method of managing excess skin that may occur following the loss of a large number of pounds after weight loss surgery. It presents a dramatic and unflattering picture of such excess skin, which, in the perspective of the article, appears only to be managed through plastic surgery.
The take-home message from this article is that through the lens of a plastic surgeon, body contouring surgery is almost a necessity following weight loss surgery. The improvements in health and feelings of wellness are not sufficient; formerly obese patients “need” a riskier surgery, the headline tells us.
This article failed to provide any framework for comparing the relative benefits and risk of the body contouring surgery as well as lacking any suggestion of other approaches for management of excess skin.
The costs of contouring are presented as tens of thousands of dollars; in addition, mention is made that they are not necessarily covered by insurers.
The article did not provide any data indicating the percentage of individuals who had had plastic surgery to remove excess skin after weight loss surgery who were satisfied with the outcomes. The perspective of a single patient was presented, concluding that for her “the pain and effort was worth the result. ” But the reader has no idea if this is typical or not.
The article details what are described as “huge scars” after surgery, along with “a long and painful recovery”. Contouring is described as “riskier” and “requiring longer recovery time” than bariatric surgery, though again – there was no quantification provided. The artilce mentions that some patients will have revision done to improve upon the original contouring procedures. Again, no data were given on how common this really is, other than to say that it, in the view of one plastic surgeon, it has “dramatically increased”.
Describing “intense discomfort that interferes with activity” as “a common problem” is hyperbole. While it may be accurate to state that many individuals who have had weight loss surgery report having hanging skin as a result, the number with excess skin and the number with discomfort associated with that skin is not the same. Providing some actual figures for these would help provide a reader with some context.
This article presents body contouring after weight loss surgery as something inevitable. It turns excess skin into a disease that must be treated. While there are individuals for whom excess skin can develop into a situation that is of health concern, this is not always the case. Further, excess skin does not just occur after bariatric surgery but can be a consequence of loss of large amounts of weight even without a bariatric procedure.
Although several plastic surgeons appear to have been quoted for this story, the perspective from a bariatric surgeon or a weight loss surgery program would have been more balanced rather than speculation about what patients are or are not told about excess skin.
While presenting quite an unpleasant picture of what excess skin following the loss of a large amount of weight might be like, the article failed to provide any other options that consumers might choose to manage excess skin.
The story says this has been “a hot topic at all the national conferences over the last couple of years”. It is unclear as to whether this indicates that there are lots of adequately trained plastic surgeons who are trained for these types of procedures or whether it is only available at certain centers. It is perhaps telling that one plastic surgeon interviewed stated that the increase in need for surgical revisions required after contouring procedures is because there are surgeons who “lack adequate experience”. The article would have been much more valuable to readers if it had provided some guidance for how consumers might evaluate the skill and proficiency of a plastic surgeon they were considering consulting for this type of work.
The article states that surgery to remove excess skin “is still relatively new”. While the numbers of people who may seek removal of hanging skin following weight loss surgery is undoubtedly increasing, plastic surgery to remove excess skin and for recontouring is actually not new. The fact that there are few studies of complication rates may relate more to the individualized nature of the procedures than to their novelty.
This article does not appear to be based solely or largely on a press release.
Systematic, Criteria-Driven
Puleeeeease... this 'game changer' weight loss drug causes more nausea and vomiting than a placebo. Some game, some change. My friend Gary would spank you for using the eighth word medical reporters should never, ever use. @garyschwitzer @thackerpd
https://www.healthnewsreview.org/toolkit/just-journalists-writing-tips-case-studies/7-words-and-more-you-shouldnt-use-in-medical-news/ https://twitter.com/OttawaCitizen/status/1361426796126830597
A scary @statnews Op-Ed warns that govt attempts to rein in Pharma may cut off access to "life-changing" drugs.
It takes @garyschwitzer to let us know: the author spent 10 years as Pfizer's public-policy chief. https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer/status/1360325022578053123
.@TranspariMED criticizes STAT op-ed for not disclosing pharma funding of author’s institute - similar to criticism we’ve made of STAT op-eds in the past. @transparify @ThinkTankWatch @icer_review https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2021/02/transparency-watchdog-criticizes-stats-non-disclosure-on-pro-pharma-op-ed/
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.