This is a story crafted around the news that the FDA has approved the sale of a lower dose, over-the-counter (OTC) version of the diet medication orlistat. The story insinuates that the OTC version would have a similar effect on weight loss as does the prescription strength. Although both are likely to be associated with weight loss, the data suggest that the weight loss is dose dependent, so the anticipated weight loss should be about half of that seen with the prescription version. Although the story alluded several times to a 10-20 pound weight loss, it failed to provide a time frame for this weight loss or any indication that weight regain was common after cessation of the drug.
Quotes from several clinicians, FDA officials, and the makers of the medication were included in this piece. Some sources expressed appropriate caveats about safety and about efficacy of the new OTC product.
Although the story lists some of the gastro-intestinal unpleasantries that occur with the use of this medication, a quote from a paper put out by the FDA (http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/ANS00951.html ) on the prescription strength form of the drug really says it better: "The most common side effects of orlistat are oily spotting, gas with discharge, fecal urgency, fatty/oily stools and frequent bowel movements."
The story mentioned alli would cost between $2-$3 per day.
The claim for this over-the-counter version of this medication was that it will have similar effect on weight loss as the dose available by prescription. However, data from the original studies designed to examine effectiveness of this medication show that the weight loss observed was dose dependent. These data suggest that the anticipated weight loss should be about half of that seen with the prescription version.
Although the story alluded several times to a 10-20 pound weight loss, it failed to provide a time frame for this weight loss or any indication that weight regain was common after cessation of the drug.
Although the story lists some of the gastro-intestinal unpleasantries that occur with the use of this medication, a quote from a paper put out by the FDA (http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/ANS00951.html ) on the prescription strength form of the drug really says it better: "The most common side effects of orlistat are oily spotting, gas with discharge, fecal urgency, fatty/oily stools and frequent bowel movements."
The story also included concerns regarding the potential for deficiency of fat-soluble vitamins occuring with the use of this medication.
The story did not include a warning for organ transplant recipients for whom this medication could cause serious problems. But it did mention concerns regarding the potential for deficiency of fat-soluble vitamins occuring with the use of this medication.
The story included a quote from the director of health research at Public Citizen regarding concerns about "precancerous lesions of the colon" derived from a single study in rats. There is currently no published data supporting similar concerns about use of this drug in humans.
The story included information from one weight loss specialist that the use of this product results in an average weight loss of 10-16 pounds. It did not mention that this was with the use of the prescription strength product, in the setting of a weight loss practice which likely included supportive interactions with health care professionals as well as reduction in calories consumed and increased exercise.
Near the end of the story, there was information ("..eating a low-fat diet containing no more than 15 grams of fat per meal would reduce the risk of the side effect.") attributed to the FDA. This sentence is actually a direct quote from the www.myalli.com website.
No overt disease-mongering about obesity; about two thirds of the way through it mentions that ~130 million Americans are overweight, and that about half of these would be considered obese.
There were many clinicians, FDA personnel, and company spokesperson quoted for this story. The views from clinicians included those who said that this product will not result in weight loss on its own.
It might have been helpful to include a link to the information released by the FDA on this product. http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2007/NEW01557.html
This story did not discuss other treatment options for the loss of comparable amounts of weight
This story is about a new product, alli, which has been approved by the FDA for sale without a prescription. The story reported that it will be available this summer.
The story was clear that alli is an over-the-counter strength of a medication that has previously been available by prescription only.
Several sources were used, so it appears unlikely the story relied solely or largely on a news release.
Systematic, Criteria-Driven
We’ve written about the hype of liquid biopsies for years (see link in comment below). And now this…. https://www.statnews.com/2022/01/12/medicare-shouldnt-cover-liquid-biopsies-early-cancer-detection/
Case counts still matter. “(There) are stories that may not be told adequately if only hospitalizations and deaths are emphasized.” @garyschwitzer interviewed by @dbauder of @AP. https://apnews.com/article/omicron-changing-news-outlets-covid-data-da9272f7c4c8a109c3bfb56bed9e9c76
My friend Gary @garyschwitzer wrote to his city council representative in a Minnesota town about a Viva Las Vegas event scheduled for January.
The response he got seems to perfectly capture where we are now.
https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2021/12/2021-ends-with-covid-craziness-in-sports-and-politics/
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like