Note to our followers: Our nearly 13-year run of daily publication of new content on came to a close at the end of 2018. Publisher Gary Schwitzer and other contributors may post new articles periodically. But all of the 6,000+ articles we have published contain lessons to help you improve your critical thinking about health care interventions. And those will be still be alive on the site for a couple of years.
Read Original Story

CBS’s same-day hip replacement story makes it sound like a new procedure

NEW YORK –– Debbie Spina is a supervisor for the radiology department at the Hospital for Joint Diseases at the NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City. But when CBS News met her this spring, she was a patient who was about to undergo same-day hip replacement surgery.

The 61-year-old had been having hip pain for the past two years because of arthritis. She had heard a lot of positive feedback from people who had undergone hip replacement surgery at her hospital. A big attraction for her was the possibility of going home right after the surgery.

“The option to go home the same day and have that family around me was something that I wanted to do,” said Spina.

She believed she would be able to recuperate more comfortably at home and get back on her feet faster.

At most hospitals, hip replacement patients can expect a one- to three-night hospital stay. Total hip replacement surgery is increasingly common, with more than 300,000 procedures done every year in the U.S. The surgery is meant to restore range of motion and help relieve arthritic pain. The procedure consists of removing the patient’s worn out ball and socket joint and inserting an artificial socket. On the femur side, a stem is inserted into the bone and a ball is on the tip of it.

NYU Langone Medical Center said it became the first academic medical center in New York City to implement a same-day hip replacement program, in 2015.

Dr. Roy Davidovitch, director of NYU Langone’s Hip Center, said he performs around 400 hip replacements a year and approximately 40 percent of those patients will go home the same day.

Davidovitch said patients are happier going home sooner. “Nothing beats the comfort of your own home for recovery. And to be quite honest, if the pain is controlled and the patient is healthy and medically completely stable there is no reason for them to be in the hospital. It really doesn’t make sense.”


Debbie Spina doing pre-hab at NYU Langone Medical Center. CBS News

There are two common surgical approaches for a total hip replacement: anterior, which involves entering surgically through the front of the hip, and posterior, or entering surgically through the side or buttocks.

According to research done by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, there are no significant differences between either approach in recovery outcomes six months after surgery.

Davidovitch favors the anterior approach, which he believes has a faster and less painful recovery period in the short term because doctors don’t have to cut through muscles or tendons to get to the hip like in the posterior approach. He does agree that in the long term, both procedures have the same outcomes for patients.


The anterior approach to hip replacement may result in a quicker short-term recovery, but over the long run patients’ outcomes are the same. CBS News

But it’s not the surgical approach alone that allows some of his patients to go home the same day — it’s a combination of what happens before, during and after surgery.

At NYU Langone patients have to do what’s called pre-hab. Before the surgery they work with an occupational and physical therapist to learn information on the procedure, learn exercises to do after the surgery and how to properly move around while they are recovering.

During the surgery, Davidovitch uses a short-acting spinal anesthetic that lasts about 2 ½ hours, and when closing the wound he injects “a cocktail of medications” to help with the inflammation and pain.

Patients can be up and walking usually within three hours after the surgery.

But they must have someone around the first night they are spending at home post-surgery.

“The people who are against the whole idea for same-day discharge for hip replacement are concerned about the very rare instances where somebody could develop a blood clot that goes to the lung, or a fracture of some sort,” said Davidovitch. “The rates of blood clots or pulmonary emboli is exceedingly low. And in general, if a patient is identified as a high risk or a higher risk we don’t send them home the same day.”


Dr. Davidovitch and his surgical team performing a hip replacement. NYU Langone Medical Center

Davidovitch makes it clear that this kind of surgery is not one-size-fits-all. Patients are screened first to make sure they don’t have risk factors like obesity, chronic liver disease or cardiac problems. Those who have risk factors must plan on staying overnight in the hospital, not going right home.

However, not every surgeon is embracing the same-day trend. Dr. Douglas Padget, chief of the joint replacement service at Hospital for Special Surgery in New York, is a lot more conservative about who he believes is the optimal patient for going home the same day.

“The number of patients that are going home at this point in time in our institution is somewhere between 1 and 2 percent. So it’s a relatively small percentage of patients that are going directly home,” said Padget.

Padget has seen an increase in the number of hip replacement patients and a decrease in their age — some are as young as their 40s and 50s. He said his department performs the most hip replacements of any institution in the U.S., doing about 5,000 a year. While he is not against patients going home the same day, he cautions that total joint replacement is a major procedure and doctors need to be careful to avoid sending patients home too soon.

“While I recognize there is no place like home, should there be the need for urgent or medical care the question is will that be available to the patient when they’re in the setting of their own home,” Padget said.

Debbie Spina met all the requirements to go home the same day. Her surgery lasted about an hour, which is the average time for her type of procedure. After the the operation she was able to move around but felt dizzy and nauseous. The occupational and physical therapists waited until evening to try and get her to go up and down steps and walk around, which patients must be able to do before they are discharged. But Spina didn’t feel well enough, so she actually ended up spending the night.

Even though her same-day discharge didn’t go as planned, Spina felt good the following morning and was able to do her exercises and leave the hospital.

After her recovery is complete, she has a few goals she’d like to reach. “I had walked prior to this four miles every morning — I’d like to do that. And I’d like to improve my golf game if possible,” Spina said while smiling.

Davidovitch’s goal is for patients to return to their normal level of activity as quickly as possible. And with many people wanting to maintain active lifestyles well into their 70s and beyond, he expects to see even greater demand for hip replacement surgery and the same-day option. “In general I see this growing to about 60 percent of my practice,” he said.


2 Star


Same-day hip replacements get patients back on their feet

Our Review Summary

MostraThis is a story about “same-day” hip replacement surgery. The story gives readers the impression that a few pioneering institutions are offering patients a superior procedure, when the reality is that hospital stays after hip replacement have been steadily shortening for many years, to the point that it is not unusual for some otherwise healthy patients to go home without spending a night in the hospital.

The story includes important cautions from a skeptical surgeon, but the prominence of the surgeon and institution that are actively marketing this procedure results in a story that implies greater benefits and fewer risks than there is evidence to support. The same surgeon and hospital were featured in a Wall Street Journal story that we reviewed in February.


Why This Matters

There are more than 300,000 hip replacement procedures performed in the United States each year. The many hundreds of thousands of people who have hip pain and are considering hip replacement need news stories that clearly and precisely state the benefits and harms of the various procedures.


Does the story adequately discuss the costs of the intervention?

Not Satisfactory

There is no discussion of the costs of hip replacement, even though it is a common procedure and its costs are widely discussed. For example, a Blue Cross Blue Shield report noted an average cost of about $30,000, but with wide variations, ranging between “$11,327 in Birmingham, Alabama, and $73,987 in Boston.”

Does the story adequately quantify the benefits of the treatment/test/product/procedure?

Not Satisfactory

The basic premise of the story is that “same-day” hip replacement offers important advantages to patients, but the only benefit specifically noted in the story is that people who opt for this procedure are less likely to spend a night in the hospital. Even then, there are only vague references and quotes from the surgeon on how many patients really go home the same day. Indeed, the one patient named in the story did not go home the same day.

The story does note that studies following hip replacement patients for at least six months find no important differences in how they fare depending on which sort of procedure they had. Still, the overall thrust of the story is that “same-day” is superior, without critically evaluating the differences between going home that day or the next.

Does the story adequately explain/quantify the harms of the intervention?


We will give the story a Satisfactory rating on this criterion because it includes comments from a surgeon who warns about the risk of serious complications during the first night after surgery.

However, the most prominent voice in the story is a surgeon who dismisses those concerns by saying, “if the pain is controlled and the patient is healthy and medically completely stable there is no reason for them to be in the hospital. It really doesn’t make sense.”

We’re not given any information or data that proves this “doesn’t make sense,” though.

We also think potential harms that could have been included are falling at home due to dizziness, or otherwise not being adequately prepared for managing under major surgery.

Does the story seem to grasp the quality of the evidence?

Not Satisfactory

The story does mention one study that found no difference in longer term outcomes of two types of hip replacement procedures. However, it fails to note that there are few good studies comparing outcomes of different types of hip replacement procedures and that the choice may rest largely on the personal experiences and preferences of individual surgeons, rather than robust scientific evidence.

Does the story commit disease-mongering?


The story does not exaggerate the extent of hip problems or the relevance of replacement surgery to people with chronic hip pain.

This does appear to target younger, healthier people, and surgery for them comes with special considerations–a hip replacement has a 20 to 25 year life span, less when put into a more physically active person. So, younger people may face a second procedure at an older age. When deciding on the timing of the first procedure, this should be considered since second surgeries are more involved and higher risk.

Does the story use independent sources and identify conflicts of interest?

Not Satisfactory

This story does include a surgeon who is skeptical of the benefits of “same-day” hip replacements. However, as noted above, the surgeon advocating the “same-day” procedure is featured far more prominently, likely creating an imbalance in reader perceptions. But the main reason for marking down the story on this criterion is that it fails to tell readers that NYU Langone has a marketing campaign tied to “same-day” hip surgery. The result is that the story supports the promotional efforts of the hospital and its surgeons without alerting readers to the commercial aspects of the matter.

The hospital tweeted an image of an earlier story on “same-day” hip replacement, indicating the marketing department understands the value of friendly coverage. also reviewed that Wall Street Journal story.

Does the story compare the new approach with existing alternatives?

Not Satisfactory

As noted above, the story exaggerates the differences between hip replacements billed as “same-day” and those that give patients more conservative timelines.

Does the story establish the availability of the treatment/test/product/procedure?


The story offers examples of hospitals currently offering “same-day” hip replacements. If anything the story understates the availability of the procedure.

However, the story could have been more clear about who this procedure is most available to, since this won’t be the right option for some people. For example, if they don’t have help at home, or if they live far from the hospital.

Does the story establish the true novelty of the approach?

Not Satisfactory

The story implies “same-day” hip replacement is new. While the practice is becoming more common, it is part of a long-term gradual trend toward shorter hospital stays, rather than a sudden break with past practice. In fact, reports on the technique note that over a decade ago some hip replacement patients were discharged the same day. The impression that NYU Langone Medical Center has a new type of procedure appears to be more marketing spin than medical fact.

Does the story appear to rely solely or largely on a news release?


The story includes original interviews and other reporting.

Total Score: 4 of 10 Satisfactory

Comments (1)

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

David Serota

May 20, 2016 at 6:32 am

Fantastic and accurate review.

As a hip surgeon, I am having to spend more and more of my time reviewing with patients the differences between marketing and science rather than the true risks and benefits of surgery. Patients have access to the Internet and use it. As members of the medical profession we should do our best to stick to the science not the hype and marketing.