Read Original Story

Thyme’s Time as Acne Remedy May Be Coming Soon


3 Star


Thyme’s Time as Acne Remedy May Be Coming Soon

Our Review Summary

The story failed to make clear that this work was not done on people – but on cells in a lab dish.

It also relied too heavily on a news release coming out of a conference. Perhaps after some peer review and some actual human testing, this thyme treatment could be ready for store shelves. For now, there’s too much hype here and not enough evidence.


Why This Matters

This is the kind of editorial ping-pong game that gives readers headaches.

The entire first half of the story builds up the promise of a petri-dish-only test of an acne remedy that “may be coming soon.”

The entire second half of the article is devoted to cursory comments from independent experts about why this isn’t ready for prime time.

Why, then, is this newsworthy?


Does the story adequately discuss the costs of the intervention?

Not Applicable

The cost of thyme – or the proposed tincture – is not in question for the moment.

Does the story adequately quantify the benefits of the treatment/test/product/procedure?

Not Satisfactory

There was no quantification of the purported benefits of thyme. The story said that “thyme was the most potent” against the bacteria that commonly cause acne and that “the thyme tincture was more powerful than standard concentrations of benzoyl peroxide, which is the active ingredient in many acne products.” Yet no where did the story explain how “most potent” and “more powerful” were measured.

Does the story adequately explain/quantify the harms of the intervention?

Not Applicable

No human testing was apparently done.  In point of fact, it’s far too early for the story to talk about either benefits or harms.

Does the story seem to grasp the quality of the evidence?

Not Satisfactory

“In the lab not in people” should have been in bold all over this story – but it wasn’t.

In fact, the story never makes clear that the tincture was apparently only tested on cells in a lab – in a highly controlled setting far different than any human application.

The leap from this to the headline of “acne remedy may be coming soon” is ridiculous.

The story did note the “findings were presented at the Society for General Microbiology’s Spring Conference in Dublin.” It would have been good context to note that the findings have not been rigorously peer-reviewed or published in a journal.

Does the story commit disease-mongering?

Not Applicable

There wasn’t any meaningful discussion of acne – so this is not applicable.

Does the story use independent sources and identify conflicts of interest?


This is an example of how simply seeking independent experts’ quotes isn’t sufficient.  Yes, there were four independent physicians quoted.  But none was quoted directly addressing the evidence with any substance.  Instead, they were quoted giving only vague reactions such as:

  • it’s intriguing
  • it is an exciting prospect
  • this is interesting
  • an herbal treatment could be fabulous

The closest thing to a helpful independent perspective was this quote: “How it works in the lab setting is very different than how it works on your skin.”

We will give the story a BARELY satisfactory score on this one, and that’s being generous.

Does the story compare the new approach with existing alternatives?


Again, we’ll give the story the benefit of the doubt with this one. The story did note that the tincture performed better than alcohol or benzoyl peroxide.

Again, barely satisfactory.

Does the story establish the availability of the treatment/test/product/procedure?

Not Satisfactory

The bold headline promising that thyme as an “acne remedy may be coming soon” promises an imminent availability that is beyond the evidence.

Does the story establish the true novelty of the approach?

Not Satisfactory

There was no discussion of any other current or past attempts to find herbal remedies – or any other remedies – for acne.

Does the story appear to rely solely or largely on a news release?


The only quotes from the researchers themselves came from a news release, but there were four independent experts quoted.  So the story didn’t technically rely solely or largely on a news release – which is our criterion.

Total Score: 3 of 7 Satisfactory


Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.