Categories

"cure" (4)
ABC News (11)
Alzheimer's (40)
animal research (5)
Appendicitis (2)
Associated Press (73)
Autism (17)
Back pain (8)
Bloomberg (15)
Boston Globe (11)
BuzzFeed (8)
Cancer (192)
Cardiovascular disease (12)
CBS News (30)
Chicago Tribune (7)
CNN (53)
Conflict of interest (4)
Depression (19)
Des Moines Register (1)
Detroit Free Press (1)
Devices (44)
Diabetes (19)
Diet studies (58)
Drug costs (5)
FiveThirtyEight.com (4)
Fox News (22)
Harms of medical treatment (7)
health food claims (45)
HealthDay (181)
HealthDay (0)
heart disease (66)
high blood pressure (0)
high blood pressure (0)
Houston Chronicle (1)
hypertension (0)
Imaging studies (11)
Immunotherapy (2)
indoor air pollution (1)
Irritable bowel syndrome (2)
Kidney Disease (4)
limits of observational studies (11)
Los Angeles Times (66)
Medical Daily (5)
Medical News Today (2)
Medicare (1)
melatonin (0)
menopause (0)
mental health (15)
MSNBC (12)
NBC News (31)
New York Times (94)
Newsweek (17)
night milk (0)
NPR (67)
Osteoporosis (6)
Pain management (5)
palliative care (0)
Philadelphia Inquirer (34)
premature babies (4)
Preventive care (5)
Respiratory Disease (1)
Reuters (34)
Reuters Health (105)
schizophrenia (3)
Screening (73)
Shared decision-making (7)
skin cancer/sun protection (11)
Slate (1)
Smoking (11)
Star Tribune (1)
STAT (21)
stem cell therapies (0)
Stroke (26)
Supplements (44)
The Arizona Republic (1)
The Dallas Morning News (2)
The Denver Post (2)
The Guardian (16)
The words matter (1)
TIME (40)
U.S. News & World Report (16)
USA Today (26)
USPSTF (2)
Vox (13)
Wall Street Journal (91)
Washington Post (51)
WebMD (82)
WebMN (0)
women's health (95)

Story Reviews

Systematic, Criteria-Driven

Toolkit

Tips for Understanding Studies

7 words (and more) you shouldn't use in medical news

Help for news release writers: Pre-publication news release review

3 reasons why you should be suspicious of study 'subgroup' results

View More

Toolkit