NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

Tag: chocolate milk

8/7/2017

University of Iowa ignores questions about its oregano ‘cure’ for cancer-wasting syndrome

4/4/2016

Questions, answers and lessons from the Maryland chocolate milk/concussions debacle

1 4/1/2016

U of Maryland review: researcher on flawed chocolate milk/concussions study failed to disclose big dairy donations  

3/30/2016

Maryland tries to run out the clock on public records requests related to chocolate milk study

2 2/18/2016

Public institutions in Maryland still ducking basic questions about chocolate milk and concussions study

2 2/2/2016

Sunshine or more stonewalling? Maryland’s latest chocolate milk disclosures dodge the difficult questions

2 1/13/2016

University of Maryland launches institutional review of chocolate milk study first flagged by HealthNewsReview.org

2 1/12/2016

How universities can avoid the next chocolate milk/concussion debacle

9 1/11/2016

Why won’t the University of Maryland talk about the chocolate milk/concussion study it was so eager to promote?

Blog

Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing

@HealthNewsRevu

HealthNewsRevuHealthNewsReview.org@HealthNewsRevu·

Our 3,222 reviews of health care journalism & PR will be gone soon. The rest of the website will remain. Read details. https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2021/01/our-3222-systematic-reviews-of-journalism-pr-will-be-gone-soon/

Reply on Twitter 1351160348615782403Retweet on Twitter 13511603486157824032Like on Twitter 13511603486157824032Twitter 1351160348615782403
HealthNewsRevuHealthNewsReview.org@HealthNewsRevu·

Year-ender: links to all 44 articles I published in 2020 - a year of too-frequent distortion, deceit and misinformation, worst I’ve seen in my 47-year career. https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2020/12/reflections-on-2020-you-cant-mask-this-reality/

Reply on Twitter 1343561730203525122Retweet on Twitter 13435617302035251229Like on Twitter 13435617302035251227Twitter 1343561730203525122
Retweet on TwitterHealthNewsReview.org Retweeted
IJNetIJNet@IJNet·

“The distinction between what we do know and what we do not yet understand should be explained more often and more clearly in our coverage,” said @garyschwitzer. Journalists need to get past press releases from drug companies, but also debunk conspiracies. https://buff.ly/2LX9MVo

Reply on Twitter 1342696898508029952Retweet on Twitter 13426968985080299525Like on Twitter 13426968985080299529Twitter 1342696898508029952
View More

Categories

View More

Tags