Looking for help?
We’ve assembled a number of tipsheets, primers, links and other resources to help journalists and consumers evaluate claims about health care interventions.
Journalists: Also see our just for journalists section.
Number needed to treat. Relative risk vs absolute risk. Observational studies. We dive into these concepts and more with our research-focused tipsheets.
Who stands to gain what is always an important question to ask–whether you’re a journalist or a healthcare consumer. But as we’ve found, many financial relationships are obscured or not ever reported, so it can be very hard to answer that question.
We invite public relations staff to submit their draft health care news releases to us for critiquing prior to publication. The objective is to help improve the flow of health care information before it reaches consumers. News releases are eligible for review if they focus on a health care intervention such as a drug, medical device, test, procedure, etc.
Our podcast, hosted by HealthNewsReview.org publisher Gary Schwitzer, aims to improve the public dialogue about health care. You’ll hear stories and interviews with people who are passionate about helping people get accurate, balanced, complete health care information so that they can make better decisions.
We’re not the only ones working hard to improve communication around medical research. These sites will provide added depth to your efforts to understand the science.
We read these sites often to stay on top of some of the best news coverage on medical research and healthcare issues in general.
Just for journalists
This page includes primers for writing about complex medical topics, advice for common pitfalls healthcare journalists face, and in-depth case studies on how we cracked open several important medical stories in recent years.
Members of our list of independent experts state that they do not have financial ties to drug or medical device manufacturers.