Note to our followers: Due to a lack of sufficient funding, will cease daily publication of new content at the end of 2018. Publisher Gary Schwitzer and other contributors may post new articles periodically. If you wish to donate, your gift might help keep the site available to the public for a few more years, by defraying costs of web hosting and maintenance. All of our 6,000+ published articles contain lessons to help people improve their critical thinking about health care. Read more about our change in status. And here's how to make a donation.

Biohype Bibliography


On this page, we’re collecting a growing number of links of articles about biohype, which:

may be described as “a phenomenon in which there is a gap between the expectations associated with the development of a genetically derived technology/field of research and the practical applications that may realistically result from it” (Stenne, Hurlimann, Godard, 2012). Biohype occurs when the anticipated and claimed benefits of a developing field of science are unrealistic, overstated, exaggerated or premature, in the view of the data and knowledge that has been gathered.

That excerpt is lifted from the website of the OMICS-ETHICS Research Group at the Bioethics Programs, University of Montreal. This screenshot from their website outlines some of their research topics.

Screen Shot 2016-02-11 at 1.14.55 PM


Michael Joyner 400x600The following list was inspired by Dr. Michael Joyner of the Mayo Clinic, who tweets about biohype as @DrMJoyner.  He will help us build this list over time.  It should help journalists working on biotech stories, and it should help interested consumers to become smarter consumers. Any opinions expressed by Dr. Joyner are his own.

Biohype may take many different forms, so we’ll try to lump our links into categories.

Things Joyner has written: 

Medical/science journal manuscripts somehow related to biohype: 

Journalism or newspaper opinion pieces touching on biohype: 

More to come.  We welcome your nominations for this list; send to


We Welcome Comments. But please note: We will delete comments left by anyone who doesn’t leave an actual first and last name and an actual email address.

We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, or profanity. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. Comments should primarily discuss the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages about health and medicine. This is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science. Nor is it a forum to share your personal story about a disease or treatment -- your comment must relate to media messages about health care. If your comment doesn't adhere to these policies, we won't post it. Questions? Please see more on our comments policy.